Not Impressed with the 103" kit
#1
Not Impressed with the 103" kit
So I was out riding with my Brother-in-Law the other and he was on his 2011 Heritage with the 103"kit. We came around a corner from a stop and we both got on our bikes and his pulled hard on me but i soon started catching up and by the time i got beside him he just let off. I have a 2006 Street Bob with a stage 1 set up (AC/V&H Big shots and stage 1 DL) otherwise a stock 88". Well after seeing the scenario of how close it seemed to me, we got on a straight away and did a rolling run from 1st gear, once again the Heritage pulled hard but when we hit 3rd gear my front tire was just behind his front tire, i then hit 4th and started pulling on him, then 5th came and i was in front of him with his front tire just behind mine. We both have been riding for several years (4wheelers, dirt bikes, street bikes) so were pretty equal on riding abilities.
I just figured I'd share that, Cause you'ld think that bike would have killed me. Now on the otherhand a club brother of my has a 06' Deluxe with a 110 and I dont even stand a chance in hell next to him he gets into the meat of his cams(dont know what they are) and its insane how hard he pulls away in a race..
I just figured I'd share that, Cause you'ld think that bike would have killed me. Now on the otherhand a club brother of my has a 06' Deluxe with a 110 and I dont even stand a chance in hell next to him he gets into the meat of his cams(dont know what they are) and its insane how hard he pulls away in a race..
#2
#3
#4
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago suburbs (Elgin/Schaumburg)
Posts: 19,481
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes
on
22 Posts
he has a counter balanced motor, slop tail, way heavier... not at all like comparing your bike and his... plus to be honest iw ould not go bolt on at all i did the jugs and flat top pistons but then chad helped me to find a cam and head work for the type of performance i wnated out of the bike. my 95 will meat stomp 103's all day long
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
The factory is claiming 100 TQ on the 103"s. But they're measuring it at the crank. It's probably putting 80 ft.lbs. at the rear wheel. I just saw a guy from Mean City Cycles dyno a 2011 103" on here a couple of days ago, and stock it was putting 65 HP to the ground. The 110" is only putting about 75 HP to the rear wheel as well. None of them perform very well in stock form. Add a set of cams and possibly some headwork and you're talking. But nothing from the factory impresses me about their engines.
#9
#10
Larger volume of hot air = increased performance. One of the biggest fallacies that exists - just look at Congress. Within a certain range increasing megapixels actually decreases quality of your pictures - totally marketing. So is most of this. Unless you spend real money on R&D redesigning intakes/cams/exhausts, etc., just watch as all of sudden you can't figure out why your market share is decreasing. Say what? - good point, the Auto/Steel/Computer industries were completely different; same thing will never happen to HD. Cheers, Kevin.
Last edited by kevmiami; 08-01-2011 at 02:52 PM.