MPG with cam upgrade ?? Just out of curiosity.
#11
If you was referring to me it was more of a curiosity type question . If you look back at my original post you will see I said I don't care about mpg and hadn't really given it a thought till I checked it just to see if it had changed with the cam upgrade. I didn't do the upgrade looking for gas mileage. Just new to Harleys and still learning what is the norm and what isn't .
#12
If you was referring to me it was more of a curiosity type question . If , you look back at my original post you will see I said I don't care about mpg and hadn't really given it a thought till I checked it just to see if it had changed with the cam upgrade. I didn't do the upgrade looking for gas mileage. Just new to Harleys and still learning what is the norm and what isn't .
#13
2014 Breakout. SE heavy breather, v&h big radius duals. Was averaging 46-48 mpg. After installing tman 555 torqster cams and dyno tune I'm now in the 39/40 mpg range . I hadn't given it much thought because I don't really care that much but is it normal to lose 6-8 mpg with that type of cam swap ?
#14
They are all they are cracked up to be in the low/mid rpm range . Not sure how to post a pic of my dyno results but I went from 72 hp to 88.5 and torque went from around 90 to 110 lbs if I remember correct . I'm over 100 ft lbs of torque from about 2300rpm up to about 5000. Those numbers may be off a tiny but as I don't have me dyno sheet in front of me but they are close .
#16
#17
Would it stand to reason that the hotter the cam, the less fuel eficiency?
For example, would a Woods TW-222 be more fuel efficient over a Woods TW-555?
Would an Andrews 48 be more fuel efficient than an Andrews 57?
Etc.........
Not that any of this really matters, but ........ curious.
For example, would a Woods TW-222 be more fuel efficient over a Woods TW-555?
Would an Andrews 48 be more fuel efficient than an Andrews 57?
Etc.........
Not that any of this really matters, but ........ curious.
#18
#19
Cam swaps and engine upgrades are a double edged sword when it comes to Fuel efficiency. Yes as you go bigger the motor does require more fuel,,, but with that same effect it is also much more efficient in the power it puts out with less throttle applied.
So if you build for torque and match your gearing if you are cruising you can still pull very good mileage ( less throttle needed to get bike in motion)
but if you are building the motor and applying bigger cams,, There is a very good chance you are going to snap that throttle and twist it farther,, which will make you burn more fuel.
I could fluctuate my fuel economy from 26 MPG to 42 MPG all in how hard I was in the throttle.
So if you build for torque and match your gearing if you are cruising you can still pull very good mileage ( less throttle needed to get bike in motion)
but if you are building the motor and applying bigger cams,, There is a very good chance you are going to snap that throttle and twist it farther,, which will make you burn more fuel.
I could fluctuate my fuel economy from 26 MPG to 42 MPG all in how hard I was in the throttle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post