Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.

Not impressed with cams!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 01:51 PM
  #21  
jeepster09's Avatar
jeepster09
Grand HDF Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,305
Likes: 9,419
From: Twin Cities Minnesota
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

ORIGINAL: mopardave

If you ever run into Mike Roland at a major bike event, talk to him. He is very personable and will explain anything you want to know. His cam power numbers are far better than anyone elses I've seen (if they are true). He seems to be the real deal and he fired up that crusher bike they have oin the website. It sounds healthy but very streetable. It makes a claimed 120 HP 110 Torque from a 95 CI TC.
You can check out their numbers here.
http://www.kuryakyn.com/wtproducts.a...gn=Dyno+Charts
I havn't run their cams yet, but I was going to before August 12th happened.
good luck

You are right, Mike is a great guy, he tuned my bike. My specs are below.

[IMG]local://upfiles/1346/6A8EA7C2BDB340E296AB7E60042A2ACD.jpg[/IMG]
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 07:41 PM
  #22  
nsodpty52's Avatar
nsodpty52
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 3
From: Nor Cal/Wine country
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

ok I'm fixing the problem, I ordered the 95 inch kit this morning.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 03:13 AM
  #23  
HDWRENCH's Avatar
HDWRENCH
Road Master
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 5
From: Fort Worth TX
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

Matching a cam to a certain level of compression is very important. We like to see a cam make in the 9.0 > 9.3 dynamic compression range. This will allow the cam to work well in all areas of the rpm band and still not have issue's with ign ping
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 04:23 AM
  #24  
sidewaysat6's Avatar
sidewaysat6
5th Gear
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

have to agree with phil m regarding larry harding, he's one of the best around. btw doubt he would recommend staying with the kury akyn air cleaner last i knew he used the doherty machine powerpaccs exclusively on his builds and mostly the woods cams.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #25  
fiddledicksr's Avatar
fiddledicksr
Cruiser
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

northern or sothern california, Anaheim Harley still dyno's
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:20 AM
  #26  
nsodpty52's Avatar
nsodpty52
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 3
From: Nor Cal/Wine country
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

northern cali, they will still dyno, just won't tune here. When i told them i had a mikuni they freaked out. they told me they would run it but i would have to tune. not worth 100 an hour for me to fumble with it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 03:30 AM
  #27  
dawg's Avatar
dawg
Seasoned HDF Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 28,274
Likes: 3,946
From: Vermont
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

What are you doing with the 95 build? Did you just order pistons and bored jugs or are you doing head work also? I'm contemplating putting in just the pistons and jugs, but some are telling me that it is a waste of time unless you port the heads.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2006 | 04:13 AM
  #28  
nsodpty52's Avatar
nsodpty52
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 3
From: Nor Cal/Wine country
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

I am having head work done too. I stopped by today and they are way hogged out! plus I went to a 1.94 intake valve. we will see what happens. I don't think anthing is "just a waste of time". take a look at the numbers the kuryakyn guys are getting with stock heads. plus if its a budget build you can always yank the heads and get them done next winter.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2006 | 12:31 AM
  #29  
nsodpty52's Avatar
nsodpty52
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 3
From: Nor Cal/Wine country
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

OK now its a runner! I finally figured out why it was flat in the top, my petcock wasnt flowing enough fuel. now it pulls all the way trough. the 95" kit helps too. this thing flat gets it. here is the list now

Weisco domed 10.5:1 pistons big bore
factory jugs bored at local machine shop
heads ported and bwls blended same machine shop
1.94 intake valves and 3 angle valve job
kuryakyn cams
SE thick head gaskets bringd the compression down to 10:1

seat of the pants, messy

still have to tune the thing I am close though bigger main jet is in order.
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #30  
GMONEY220's Avatar
GMONEY220
Road Warrior
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 14
From: Bay Area 41510 To Vegas!!!
Default RE: Not impressed with cams!

Dep can you post some pics and give us a price breakdown?Thanks
ORIGINAL: nsodpty52

OK now its a runner! I finally figured out why it was flat in the top, my petcock wasnt flowing enough fuel. now it pulls all the way trough. the 95" kit helps too. this thing flat gets it. here is the list now

Weisco domed 10.5:1 pistons big bore
factory jugs bored at local machine shop
heads ported and bwls blended same machine shop
1.94 intake valves and 3 angle valve job
kuryakyn cams
SE thick head gaskets bringd the compression down to 10:1

seat of the pants, messy

still have to tune the thing I am close though bigger main jet is in order.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.