When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
General Topics/Tech TipsDiscussion on break in periods, rider comfort, seats and pad suggestions. Tech tips as they become available will be posted here.
Thinking ahead of a winter project and I'm considering building a Harley. I'm reasonably handy and I've done several projects on my current ride. I've got the space, the tools and the ability. I'm looking forward to the learning. My question to the group is: what model or and years would be good for a first time builder? I don't want to build something I could just go buy on a used lot. Since I have a touring bike already, I'm not looking at doing one of those. I'd probably want a carbed bike, just for simplicity. But do I want a Shovel? Or an FXR? Or a Softail? Should I avoid the AMF years? Something with easy to find parts would be great, too. What would your recommendations be?
Pick the one YOU like and have at it! When you get to the core (engine and power train) they are basically all the same. IF I were doing a build I'd start with an evo fat boy or a soft tail standard. Evo parts can be had from S&S, Revtech and many other suppliers. They are a little simpler than a twinkie and not as hard to find parts for as a shovel or pan.
Funny you mention a Fat Boy. When I was out bike shopping for my current ride (a 2007 RK Custom) I was in the market for a Fat Boy. I saw the RK Custom and initially thought it was a FB - minimal chrome, no windshield, etc. I call it my Fat Boy on Steroids! So a FB might be a good choice - but as you said, an EVO model, not the counter-balanced model... we shall see!
Evo Softail, dime a dozen on CL and the aftermarket will have you covered for ANYTHING you can think to do. And the motors are pretty bullet proof. Try and find a low mileage bike and have at it. Good luck.
Interesting. I've been leaning towards an Evo for just that reason (solid motor, easy to learn/fix). And I saw a local guy has a Softail Custom for sale as a project bike (ha ha). Says it's all there but the motor is torn apart. I'm skeptical, but inquiring. Ideally, I think I'd like to do an Evo Fat Boy. But a ST Custom with the larger front wheel would be a nice cruiser alternative to my Road King...
Interesting. I've been leaning towards an Evo for just that reason (solid motor, easy to learn/fix). And I saw a local guy has a Softail Custom for sale as a project bike (ha ha). Says it's all there but the motor is torn apart. I'm skeptical, but inquiring. Ideally, I think I'd like to do an Evo Fat Boy. But a ST Custom with the larger front wheel would be a nice cruiser alternative to my Road King...
No reason for a "project", a solid running bike can be had for under $5k, look around. You can have a lot of fun making the bike yours without touching the motor and transmission. Good luck.
Sporty all the way ! They are about the easiest bike to get custom parts for and are very popular with the 'customisers'.
Check out the Sportster section here...b.
No reason for a "project", a solid running bike can be had for under $5k, look around. You can have a lot of fun making the bike yours without touching the motor and transmission. Good luck.
That's sort of what I've done with my King: bars, pipes, fairings and assorted accessories. I'm looking for something I can get more "into". I'm not afraid of touching the motor. In fact, I'd like to. Maybe I need to find one that runs but maybe isn't perfect and tackle that instead of an entire build project?
If you're a bike builder then the options are unlimited.
If I had a choice, I build a 90-94 FXR. My first build I learned things the hard way. It's cheaper to buy a used bike and do a total rebuild than it is to start from nothing. Starting from zero means you have to buy every nut and bolt, usually you have about twice the amount into it than it's worth. It will be a one off that's for sure but it gets expensive starting with nothing on the table.
If you buy something used as a starting point, try to find something as unmolested as you can.
If you're a bike builder then the options are unlimited.
If I had a choice, I build a 90-94 FXR. My first build I learned things the hard way. It's cheaper to buy a used bike and do a total rebuild than it is to start from nothing. Starting from zero means you have to buy every nut and bolt, usually you have about twice the amount into it than it's worth. It will be a one off that's for sure but it gets expensive starting with nothing on the table.
If you buy something used as a starting point, try to find something as unmolested as you can.
Well, I'm *not* a builder, which is the reason I'm soliciting advice!
As I've been reading and researching this project, I've come to the same conclusion: that I should start with a re-build project, not a "build" project. I'd like to do an FXR but as far as not-yet-restored bikes, I'm finding more FX's than I am FXR's. Which is fine. An FX sounds like fun, anyway!
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.