Idle video

 

I don't have one with this exhaust and the exhaust is what dictates the curve. It would be apples to oranges.

 

The air cleaner and mufflers are going to hurt the power on your set up, the mufflers for low end torque and the air cleaner will cost you up top.

Call Fuel Moto and get a set of their Outlaw mufflers and one of the K&N ventilator style air cleaners.

 

The video Quik shared was with Fuel Moto Outlaw mufflers.

 

This is what most seem to miss, due to the forum "experts" saying otherwise. If you don't get the right exhaust combination, your outcome will suffer. Will it matter to you, well that is only up to you and what you are looking for.If your looking for the most bang for the buck, the Fuel Moto Outlaw mufflers will get you there. And they are still good for upgrades beyond that.

 

If you want to talk about what's been said, at least do it properly and in the proper context. IF a cam comes in at the lower end of testing, time and time again by several various shops running cam testing, then one other shops says its the top performer if you build it there way, then somethings wrong. Exhaust and intake always play a part in what the outcome is going to be but to try and single out a special exhaust and a special intake just to make a cam work is just dumb. This seems to be what your missing with your above mislead statements.

 

I have no plans to change out my exhaust set up. I think fuelmoto has been very helpful to me thus far and will most likely buy my cam /kit and powervision through them, however not a fan of the sound of the outlaw mufflers. I'm ok with a little less torque for the lower sound tone I have. Plus it will be more than My current set up.. a plus for me.

Guess I was wondering more if this would be a good bolt on for my set up / easily tunable and possibly a better lower end riding curve than the rs468. It appears it will be a great cam.

Think I'll hold off just a little longer to make the best choice for me

I do know I like the sound of the rs468 with rinehart set up and there is a very good PV tune for it.. however some say it's a little jerky and rough at very low speed.. if the cr480 is smoother there it may sell me otherwise might just go with the rs468 and be done with it.

Still gonna watch and wait for more info on this cam as I dont need to rush it.

 

That looks pretty good especially with that exhaust. I think I'll keep my Zippers 468 though. I know different dynos give out different numbers but we're close at my 105 hp to their 108 max hp. Notice the 468 produces so much torque at 2500 rpm where we often cruise and hold over 110 torque til 4900 rpm. It's instant torque right where I want it on a bagger. Of course this has the benefit of the D&D Billet Cat. It's pretty well know this is a great combo. I'd like to the the 480 cam with the D&D which is noted for low and mid range torque.

 

This confused me. I have not seen a single test comparing the CR-480 to other cams, so how did it come in at the lower end of testing? Or are you referring to the 22x?

 

You are correct (22x) Rin Tin is trying to take statements made, completely out of context and apply them to fit his way of thinking for some reason. The 480 appears to work very much like the RS468 and the TTS100 from whats being reported. Those two cams were the top ones in testing and the difference between them and all the others in the testing showed in both the dyno and acceleration testing. The 468 has a lope or roughness at idle and low RPM and the100 did not. It sounds like the 480 is more like the 468 for idle lope or roughness at low RPM from what is being stated.