Touring on a softail?!
#1
#3
The Ultra is much better handling bike to ride on a 75 mph freeway. To be fair, however, this heavy beast of a bike isn't much fun to maneuver in parking lot.
#5
My wife rented a 2015 Heritage Softail Classic for a four-day trip she and I took last weekend and found it very comfortable. I rode it some too and thought it was comfortable also. Things I didn't like: no locking saddlebags, the head buffeting at freeway speed (Ultra Limited is MUCH better), the wobbling at high speed, the limited top speed and the 103B engine vibration around 4,000 RPM. You just got to take it a little easier on this bike.
The Ultra is much better handling bike to ride on a 75 mph freeway. To be fair, however, this heavy beast of a bike isn't much fun to maneuver in parking lot.
The Ultra is much better handling bike to ride on a 75 mph freeway. To be fair, however, this heavy beast of a bike isn't much fun to maneuver in parking lot.
1) no locking saddlebags- a locking kit is available but I haven't had anyone steal anything yet.
2) head buffeting at freeway speed- a taller windshield eliminates this (I have a 20" Klockwerks Billboard Flare shield that I install for longer rides and I get no buffering)
3) wobbling at high speed- I'm not sure what this relates too. At 80 mph my Heritage is smooth.
Of course being somewhat lighter it does move around when being passed by semis.
4) limited top speed- I'm not sure how fast you want to go.
My Heritage has at least a top speed of 100 mph.
I'm not sure why anyone needs to go faster than that.
5) 103B engine vibration around 4,000 RPM- I suppose there is a vibration but at 4000 RPMs I'm running better than 80 mph and I rarely travel for any length of time above 75.
At the end of the day the Heritage is not a touring bike but a softail that has touring capabilities.
Add some Progressive 422 RAP Shocks, taller windshield, a tour pak and some tunes and the Heritage goes down the highway just fine.
That being said if better than 50% of your riding is touring; buy a touring bike.
Last edited by Bluraven; 07-09-2015 at 05:49 AM.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I just did 2500 mile round trip Chicago to Texas and back. Had a great time. Windshield,fangs,shotgun shock,heritage springer seat with gel insert all made for a very enjoyable trip. I will have a touring bike maybe next year but in the meantime my deluxe is great. When I get the touring bike I will still keep the deluxe as I also kept my sportster when I got the deluxe. I will never recoup anywhere near what I put into them making them my own so why sell. My only problem right now is do I go HD, Indian or Victory for a tourer. Have to say the Victory Magnum is looking pretty good.
#9
I actually went backwards from a touring bike from another brand to a Heritage. I love the lighter feeling and handling but you do get blown around more. Most I would likely ride is 300-400 miles a day and I don't have any problems on this bike.
I ride 2 up but only about 40% of the time or less. If I were riding 2 up more I would have considered a road king, the air shocks make it nice to balance out the suspension with 2 people. Mine feels a little wallowy with my wife and I on it.
I would guess aftermarket suspension and maybe a nicer seat (I've been pretty happy with the stock one though) this thing would be as comfortable as anything else. I did notice a little more vibration like was stated at 4000 rpm but I never ride on the e-way that fast so it's not an issue for me.
As of right now my next bike will likely be another Heritage in a few years, only because I wouldn't mind the 103 motor over my 96. They are fantastic bikes.
I ride 2 up but only about 40% of the time or less. If I were riding 2 up more I would have considered a road king, the air shocks make it nice to balance out the suspension with 2 people. Mine feels a little wallowy with my wife and I on it.
I would guess aftermarket suspension and maybe a nicer seat (I've been pretty happy with the stock one though) this thing would be as comfortable as anything else. I did notice a little more vibration like was stated at 4000 rpm but I never ride on the e-way that fast so it's not an issue for me.
As of right now my next bike will likely be another Heritage in a few years, only because I wouldn't mind the 103 motor over my 96. They are fantastic bikes.
#10
I have a '12 Ultra and an '03 Heritage. I like the Ultra better for long hours in the saddle, and it is the bike I choose for long or multi-day trips. After a while you won't notice the size, and the more upright seating position is supposed to be more comfortable on long hauls
...... BUT ......
Prior to buying the bagger, I've done several trips (400-500 miles/day) with the Heritage. My Heritage, OEM, was more than capable for for long trips.
I've always threatened to get a different seat, but haven't yet, and I finally got a shorter, recurve windshield. I don't like looking through the windshield. I never noticed the "B" motor buzz, until I spent some time on the bagger. I now notice it, but don't consider it an issue.
While I prefer the Ultra, if the Heritage fits you better (feel, seat position, etc), it will ultimately be better for you on the long haul.....
Good luck with your decision....
...... BUT ......
Prior to buying the bagger, I've done several trips (400-500 miles/day) with the Heritage. My Heritage, OEM, was more than capable for for long trips.
I've always threatened to get a different seat, but haven't yet, and I finally got a shorter, recurve windshield. I don't like looking through the windshield. I never noticed the "B" motor buzz, until I spent some time on the bagger. I now notice it, but don't consider it an issue.
While I prefer the Ultra, if the Heritage fits you better (feel, seat position, etc), it will ultimately be better for you on the long haul.....
Good luck with your decision....
Last edited by hattitude; 07-09-2015 at 09:44 AM.