Softail Models Standard, Custom, Night Train, Deuce, Springer, Heritage, Fatboy, Deluxe, Rocker and Cross Bones.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4 in crank or stock 4.375 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #1  
jrfernandez7's Avatar
jrfernandez7
Thread Starter
|
Novice
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Reno,Nevada
Default 4 in crank or stock 4.375 ?

I have 07' fatboy and this winter i plan on doing my build. The past couple of weeks i've seen some threads on builds with a lot of people saying the 4 inch crank and all bore is the way to go. I just got the s&s 106 bolt on kit for my 4.375 crank a few weeks ago. I plan on splitting the cases for the timken install what do i need to do to make the 4 inch crank work on my bike or should i even bother? I also plan on doing my heads with t-man stage 3, dark horse crank work and 590 gear cams. I'm spending a lot of money to do it right so need some opinions. Do i go with 4 in crank all bore,case boring to go bigger or stay with my s&s 106 bolt on. Keep in mind i ride 15,000 a year and ride like i stole it!
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #2  
SEDELUXE's Avatar
SEDELUXE
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Default

no send your crank to dark horse.
those t-man heads will work really well wuth that cam.
do what you are planning it will give you plenty of power andreliability
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
GunmetalBlueNT's Avatar
GunmetalBlueNT
Banned
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 2
Default

You know my stance. An all bore engine is the way to go. The twin cam engine was designed around a 4" crank as a 95" engine to begin with(the Moco before release shrunk the bore on factory bikes to an 88" for emission purposes and made an optional "95 inch BB kit" as an aftermarket/SE add on/upgrade). By going all bore with a 4" crank, with either a 107"(4.125" piston)combo or a 114"(4.25" piston)combo, you gain engine displacement, while keeping side loading, piston speed, and general engine wear to a minimum, while gaining in the process a naturally smoother running engine(via and oversquare engine setup)in the process. For a street engine this is optimal. I'd take a 107" or 114" oversquare design with the 4" crank any day of the week over say a 106/107", 110" or 113" that utilizes a 4 3/8th crank with a smaller bore.
 

Last edited by GunmetalBlueNT; Jul 30, 2009 at 04:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 06:05 PM
  #4  
PaleRearEnd's Avatar
PaleRearEnd
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 1
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by GunmetalBlueNT
You know my stance. An all bore engine is the way to go. The twin cam engine was designed around a 4" crank as a 95" engine to begin with(the Moco before release shrunk the bore on factory bikes to an 88" for emission purposes and made an optional "95 inch BB kit" as an aftermarket/SE add on/upgrade). By going all bore with a 4" crank, with either a 107"(4.125" piston)combo or a 114"(4.25" piston)combo, you gain engine displacement, while keeping side loading, piston speed, and general engine wear to a minimum, while gaining in the process a naturally smoother running engine(via and oversquare engine setup)in the process. For a street engine this is optimal. I'd take a 107" or 114" oversquare design with the 4" crank any day of the week over say a 106/107", 110" or 113" that utilizes a 4 3/8th crank with a smaller bore.
+1

Bore that Biotch! send in the crank!
 

Last edited by PaleRearEnd; Jul 30, 2009 at 06:16 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 07:01 PM
  #5  
Chazmanian's Avatar
Chazmanian
R.I.P. BROTHER
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 6
From: Colorado Springs
Default

As much as I honestly cant stand this creepy Gunnie guy....That was a heckuva good post.

Fvcken' weirdo makes me want an all bore 107" so bad....I can tell a difference between the way my bike revs Vs' a buddy of mines 96 stage 1 bike. Its not just the cams and headwork. Mine snaps when his digs deep and grunts.

At least thats how I feel it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #6  
SEDELUXE's Avatar
SEDELUXE
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Default

i like the 43/8 crank better as once it is Darkhorsed and timkin done at 107 if he decides to up the cubic inches later all he will have eto do is bore the ecases again and axtell cylinders and then he will have a 117.
i am running a 41/2 in crank and have absoluty no issues with it at all. if he lived in NJ i would let him ride mine.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #7  
SEDELUXE's Avatar
SEDELUXE
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Default

i wil post my dyno sheets in the softtail section tonight
G
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #8  
Chazmanian's Avatar
Chazmanian
R.I.P. BROTHER
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 6
From: Colorado Springs
Default

Originally Posted by SEDELUXE
i like the 43/8 crank better as once it is Darkhorsed and timkin done at 107 if he decides to up the cubic inches later all he will have eto do is bore the ecases again and axtell cylinders and then he will have a 117.
i am running a 41/2 in crank and have absoluty no issues with it at all. if he lived in NJ i would let him ride mine.
Gunnie is making 160/140 on his build.

That must be bezerkoe insane snappy on that 4" stroke eh?
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 01:44 AM
  #9  
jrfernandez7's Avatar
jrfernandez7
Thread Starter
|
Novice
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Reno,Nevada
Default

I would really like to go with the 4 inch crank and the axtell 114 kit but it's going to cost a lot more than going with the axtell 117 with my own crank! Is the wear and tear with the 4 3/8 crank really that bad! Also nobody has told me what it will take to modify or adapt the 4 inch crank. In other words i know it's not a straight bolt in unit. I want to know because it will help me determine which way i go with my build. My 106 kit i can sell on ebay or craigslist so no worries there.I have 4500 now to spend and another 2500 by early spring for a total of 7 grand to work with.My shopping list goes like this t-man heads,t-man 590 gear cams,s&s gear drive conversion,hpi 51mm throttle body,fueling cam plate,fueling oil pump,s&s roller rocker arms,woods rocker arm support,d&d fatcat big bore qt and dark horse work with timken/case bore.If you guys can think of any thing else please do tell.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 02:44 AM
  #10  
GunmetalBlueNT's Avatar
GunmetalBlueNT
Banned
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by jrfernandez7
I would really like to go with the 4 inch crank and the axtell 114 kit but it's going to cost a lot more than going with the axtell 117 with my own crank! Is the wear and tear with the 4 3/8 crank really that bad! Also nobody has told me what it will take to modify or adapt the 4 inch crank. In other words i know it's not a straight bolt in unit. I want to know because it will help me determine which way i go with my build. My 106 kit i can sell on ebay or craigslist so no worries there.I have 4500 now to spend and another 2500 by early spring for a total of 7 grand to work with.My shopping list goes like this t-man heads,t-man 590 gear cams,s&s gear drive conversion,hpi 51mm throttle body,fueling cam plate,fueling oil pump,s&s roller rocker arms,woods rocker arm support,d&d fatcat big bore qt and dark horse work with timken/case bore.If you guys can think of any thing else please do tell.
And why isnt the 4" crank a bolt in? Sure it is.

Lets see on the budget:

A. Timken bearing conversion and case boring: $600
B. Plug,tig and true from Darkhorse $150 I believe, add $400 for static balancing(not needed)if you want to go the extra mile.
C. Axtell 114" lite kit $1400 retail(there are places you can get it for a grand even)
D. Tman heads: $1300

So for the base and most expensive items were at $3500. Probably less if you shop smartly.

You have 7 grand to work with plus I assume the price of the 106 kit if you Ebay it. You can easily pull off a 114" setup to be within your budget if your smart take your time and shop around.

And to add, I did a 114" for a friend who was on a budget of $3000. He bullitproofed the bottom end, did a MILD bolt in cam, mild inexpensive work to the heads to let em breath better and he put down 110hp/130tq numbers. It was an absolute stump puller. In less than 2 years time he has put almost 50k on the build. Runs flawlessly.
 

Last edited by GunmetalBlueNT; Jul 31, 2009 at 02:59 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM.


Top

© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Follow Us        



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.