Woods 222
I have the TW-222s with Rinehart extreme true duals. I'm pretty pleased with them as a bolt in cam for a 103. They pull like a freight train down low and do run out of steam on the top end (4500+ rpm), but for a real world everyday touring bike they are great. I've been very happy with mine. If you want to bench race or brag about your dyno numbers, pick another cam.
2010 Limited with some stuff!!
I put in the 222's , fuel moto 2-1-2 head pipe , street canon slip on's, stage 1 air filter and use a power vision tuner.
2013 SG, 103 ci.
The bike has excelent power from 2000 and runs out to 5000.
Real word power where you need it, throtle responce is very good. The power is just a twist away all the time, no delay or waiting to get into the power band it just goes.
Over all huge improvement over stock. It's like a whole new bike!
2013 SG, 103 ci.
The bike has excelent power from 2000 and runs out to 5000.
Real word power where you need it, throtle responce is very good. The power is just a twist away all the time, no delay or waiting to get into the power band it just goes.
Over all huge improvement over stock. It's like a whole new bike!
The guy that you saw doing that had a lot more displacement underneath him than just 103 cubic inches.
I have the TW-222 cams in my 103", and they produce impressive torque for me from 2200-4500 RPM. That being said, they'll never produce the kind of light to light tire spinning power you're looking for.
Last edited by gipper; Jan 22, 2015 at 10:24 AM.
The guy that you saw doing that had a lot more displacement underneath him than just 103 cubic inches. I have the TW-222 cams in my 103", and they produce impressive torque for me from 2200-4500 RPM. That being said, they'll never produce the kind of light to light tire spinning power you're looking for.



