Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Considering a engine upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 08:21 PM
  #1  
Andrewwayne's Avatar
Andrewwayne
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 280
Likes: 79
From: Tennessee
Default Considering a engine upgrade

I have a 2011 Electra glide classic. 96in with Andrews 48 cams dresser duals and fuel moto outlaw slipons. Bike has 58000 miles on it. Runs perfect I’m considering doing a fuel moto 107 kit but still on the fence. With those miles on it would the added power be just asking for stuff to start breaking? How much more power will be noticed. I ride solo most the time With a few day trip 2 up with my wife. What are y’alls thoughts on the 107 build vs stock with cams. Should I worry about the crank with the miles and the valves and valve seats?
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 08:25 PM
  #2  
Litewings's Avatar
Litewings
Tourer
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 379
Likes: 38
From: Nebraska
Default

Originally Posted by Andrewwayne
I have a 2011 Electra glide classic. 96in with Andrews 48 cams dresser duals and fuel moto outlaw slipons. Bike has 58000 miles on it. Runs perfect I’m considering doing a fuel moto 107 kit but still on the fence. With those miles on it would the added power be just asking for stuff to start breaking? How much more power will be noticed. I ride solo most the time With a few day trip 2 up with my wife. What are y’alls thoughts on the 107 build vs stock with cams. Should I worry about the crank with the miles and the valves and valve seats?
I'm in for answers to these questions too. 13 SG. 103 with stage 1 53k miles.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 08:26 PM
  #3  
sanman4ever's Avatar
sanman4ever
Club Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 329
From: Rhode Island
Riders Club Member
Default

Whichever way to go ditch those dresser duals.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 08:29 PM
  #4  
Andrewwayne's Avatar
Andrewwayne
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 280
Likes: 79
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by sanman4ever
Whichever way to go ditch those dresser duals.
How come? I like the look and sound but don’t know that much about the cons of them
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 08:36 PM
  #5  
sanman4ever's Avatar
sanman4ever
Club Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 329
From: Rhode Island
Riders Club Member
Default

Originally Posted by Andrewwayne
How come? I like the look and sound but don’t know that much about the cons of them
Awful for performance. The V&H dresser duals are the worst performing of all the true dual set ups as well.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2019 | 11:18 PM
  #6  
bigskyroadglide's Avatar
bigskyroadglide
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 185
From: Mountain West, Big Sky Country
Default

Originally Posted by Andrewwayne
I have a 2011 Electra glide classic. 96in with Andrews 48 cams dresser duals and fuel moto outlaw slipons. Bike has 58000 miles on it. Runs perfect I’m considering doing a fuel moto 107 kit but still on the fence. With those miles on it would the added power be just asking for stuff to start breaking? How much more power will be noticed. I ride solo most the time With a few day trip 2 up with my wife. What are y’alls thoughts on the 107 build vs stock with cams. Should I worry about the crank with the miles and the valves and valve seats?
I had Fuel Moto do my 10 Roadglide with their 107 kit last November.

Bike had 33k on it at the time.

I, like you, had a 96 with Andrews 48s and was clocking about 98 ft lbs of torque. I was tuned with the fp3 and ran V&H true duals with cobra 3.5 slip ons.

Bike ran solid got great fuel economy and sounded good but at the end of the summer before I upgraded started to get hot and was down on power.

I scheduled my appointment with FM, drove up one afternoon before the scheduled day and dropped the bike off right after they opened.

FM completed my bike that afternoon and called saying I could pick up the next day.

I did 107, level b heads, woods 777 cams and FM air cleaner.
Had purchased a PV before the upgrade dumping the FP3.

I ended up right at 123 ft lbs of torque and around 115 hp.

Bike runs great, fuel economy is Rock solid, engine no longer gets hot and I have power in any gear across the power range.

All total I'm in, including the PV around $4K.

I'd do it again, in a heartbeat.

PS, I still have original comp, and have ridden over 10k this summer after the upgrade and the only service issue I have had is a failed front fork seal.

My experience, yours could vary.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 05:19 AM
  #7  
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
Club Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45,429
Likes: 2,896
From: Bedford UK
Cool

Originally Posted by Andrewwayne
How come? I like the look and sound but don’t know that much about the cons of them
FM offer a range of tuning options, so if you decide to go with them then ask their advice on ALL aspects of your upgrade. That will inevitably include a fresh exhaust, so include that in your budget.

As for true dual exhausts, that is how most twins came in the past. Then during the '60s IIRC BSA discovered by chance that adding a balance pipe between the separate exhausts improved low/mid range performance significantly, over separate pipes. That is why today every twin-cylinder bike made comes stock with some sort of siamesed system, including our Harleys. So to get the best out of your upgrade, go with the flow!
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 06:01 AM
  #8  
todd-67's Avatar
todd-67
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,899
Likes: 3,412
From: OH
Default

I did my 107 build the winter before last. with doing the heads I ended up with pretty much the same number as everyone else, 126tq/116hp. I thin the longevity is in how you drive it if it is put together correctly. I haven't head any issues with mine.

I upgraded from a 96" with a 48h cam as well.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 07:04 AM
  #9  
Screamin beagle's Avatar
Screamin beagle
Seasoned HDF Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 5,315
Likes: 4,272
From: Granville New York
Default

I think longevity is a roll of the dice no matter how you drive it. Are you going to spend 3 or 4k on your engine then drive like grandma heading to bingo? No. I'm not saying doing clutch drops and drag racing from every stop light either. I have an 08 cvo road king that had 43k on the clock. Crank runout had been holding steady at .003 and had good oil analysis. I had a good stage one setup but wanted more. So I got heads and cams. Bike ran great. I dont abuse my bike but i do make use of the power. All was well for 7k this summer then I felt some me vibration and it was downhill from there. All I did was hit the rev limiter in 4th gear passing a car. That's all it took to shift the crank. Found the big end connecting rod bearings were on the way out too. Just got done putting one of these in from darkhorse. Bike is so smooth now. Now I'm ready t9 build a monster. Build it ,enjoy it, break it, fix it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2019 | 04:32 PM
  #10  
Andrewwayne's Avatar
Andrewwayne
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 280
Likes: 79
From: Tennessee
Default

Thanks for the information. I don’t ride too aggressive but do like to twist it every now and then, but rarely exceed 4500 rpm my main reason would be to get a little more power and i like tinkering with stuff. Would I be better with a stock head pipe than with the duals? I really don’t want to change pipes these are less than a year old
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 PM.