I am interested in seeing dyno numbers from baggerz with 88 cubes only. Please post your dynoed HP & TQ, along with what you did and who did it. I have a 99 king FLHPI with an88 TC and want to build it next year. My old evo (80 ci) dynoed 85 with a good build, but not radical. I am not interested in 95, 103, 110, or larger ci, only 88 TC #'s. There is a lot of potential in these TC's, they are good motors.
Currently I have a pclll, open intake and home built exhausts, motor is otherwise stock. 72 HP and 79TQ at about 4000 RPM.
Thanks in advance.

 

Pictures of the pipes on your scooter?
[sm=ttiwwp.gif]

 

I sent them in to the paint shop, hopeing to get them back in a couple of weeks. I took the stock exhausts cut them off just behind the rear mount and ground off the welds and punched out the baffles. When I put them back on the bike they sounded like a Yamaha on steroids, so I went to the local tractor supply and bought an 80 chain sprocket just large enough to weld inside my muffler. My thinking was the inner diameter hole was large and exhaust could also escape along the outside of the sprocket, but there wasenough metal there to change the tone of the exhaust. Put it back on the bike and I loved the sound. I rewelded the end of the muffler back on, but instead of the turnout pointing down it now points 100 degrees to the outside away from the hard bags.

 

You can see my numbers in my Sig. Stock 88 except for A/C, exhaust and PCIII.

 

Check the sig.

 

superglide what rpms are you that high, their good #'s for intake exhaust and sert only.

 

Superglide 04and FLHTbasically have the same mods but such a huge difference in numbers, why is that?

 

I'm guessing this would have an effect on the peak numbers.

 

My info:
2006 FLHTCI 88"
SE Stage 1 kit
SERT
25 degree injectors & d/l
80463 HD Catalyst touring mufflers
SE TC 88 Hi Compression 1450 pistons (9.5:1)
SE 211 Cam

85 ft-lbs peak @ 4000 rpm
82 hp peak @ 6000 rpm

Very smooth performance compared to stock...

Done by American HD in Ann Arbor, MI


Seem to be having trouble uploading pix today...[:@]
[align=center]




Program File Name
/uploadpro.asp

COM Error Number
-2146825284 (0x800A0BBC)

Error File Name
/js/PGDUpload.asp

Line Number
558

Brief Description
Write to file failed.[/align]



_uacct = "UA-939292-2";
urchinTracker();

 

Great question.....Do you think just the different head pipes would make that much of a difference?

Here is a sheet can somebody explain the big difference in our numbers