Andrews 54 or woods 7h cam?
#1
Andrews 54 or woods 7h cam?
Have an 08 SG that I ride two up and want a good torque cam but NOT a 255 cam
Planning a 107 build can decide on cam. My final choices are near the same by the dynos listed on various sites
Plan 1: GMR 107 with stage 3 headwork, 30 HG andrews 54 cam 9.8 compression, tapered pushrods, compression releases. TTS tuner, d&d fat cat with quiet baffle.
Plan2: GMR 107 stage 3 headwork, 30 HG woods 7h cam, adjustable pushrods, compression releases, TTS tuner, d&d fat cats.
Either should be good bagger build for torque likely 100+ HP and TQ. Question is which would be easier/cheaper to build, more reliable, easier to tune and better with todays fuel.
Don't want to have to go with roller rockers or supports. Believe the 54 with less agressive ramps would be easier on lifters and rocker arms.
Got parts boxed up and ready to pull the trigger this coming week.
Planning a 107 build can decide on cam. My final choices are near the same by the dynos listed on various sites
Plan 1: GMR 107 with stage 3 headwork, 30 HG andrews 54 cam 9.8 compression, tapered pushrods, compression releases. TTS tuner, d&d fat cat with quiet baffle.
Plan2: GMR 107 stage 3 headwork, 30 HG woods 7h cam, adjustable pushrods, compression releases, TTS tuner, d&d fat cats.
Either should be good bagger build for torque likely 100+ HP and TQ. Question is which would be easier/cheaper to build, more reliable, easier to tune and better with todays fuel.
Don't want to have to go with roller rockers or supports. Believe the 54 with less agressive ramps would be easier on lifters and rocker arms.
Got parts boxed up and ready to pull the trigger this coming week.
#2
I would talk to Steve and see what he says and go with it. Its always important to stick with what a builder says.
That being said, the wood cams set up properly will feel torquier and stronger.
I have used both cams but prefer the Wood, but again with the heads you are choosing, go with Steve's recomendation as his heads may differ.
That being said, the wood cams set up properly will feel torquier and stronger.
I have used both cams but prefer the Wood, but again with the heads you are choosing, go with Steve's recomendation as his heads may differ.
#4
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I will happily take my sucky 116 ft-lbs that the 625 gives me.
#9
Not sure of the source of your comment, but recommend you visit T-man's website or google on the net for numerous forum postings with build results. T-Man site has dyno results for many of his builds using the TR590 and TR625 cams, depending on several variables (heads, exhaust, TB, etc.). Both set-ups make outstanding useable tq and hp for bagger needs.
#10