stock 96 ci hp and torque
#2
#5
Let's see... I'll guess 66.08hp & 77.63tq.
From Fuel Motos website:
This dyno compares a completely stock 09 Touring, to the additition of TW6-6 cams, Jackpot Dyno Tuned Mufflers, Jackpot 2-1-2 head pipe, stage 1 air cleaner & PCV.
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/09stkvsjackpottw6.jpg
From Fuel Motos website:
This dyno compares a completely stock 09 Touring, to the additition of TW6-6 cams, Jackpot Dyno Tuned Mufflers, Jackpot 2-1-2 head pipe, stage 1 air cleaner & PCV.
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/09stkvsjackpottw6.jpg
#6
Let's see... I'll guess 66.08hp & 77.63tq.
From Fuel Motos website:
This dyno compares a completely stock 09 Touring, to the additition of TW6-6 cams, Jackpot Dyno Tuned Mufflers, Jackpot 2-1-2 head pipe, stage 1 air cleaner & PCV.
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/09stkvsjackpottw6.jpg
From Fuel Motos website:
This dyno compares a completely stock 09 Touring, to the additition of TW6-6 cams, Jackpot Dyno Tuned Mufflers, Jackpot 2-1-2 head pipe, stage 1 air cleaner & PCV.
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/09stkvsjackpottw6.jpg
#7
Let's see... I'll guess 66.08hp & 77.63tq.
From Fuel Motos website:
This dyno compares a completely stock 09 Touring, to the additition of TW6-6 cams, Jackpot Dyno Tuned Mufflers, Jackpot 2-1-2 head pipe, stage 1 air cleaner & PCV.
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/09stkvsjackpottw6.jpg
From Fuel Motos website:
This dyno compares a completely stock 09 Touring, to the additition of TW6-6 cams, Jackpot Dyno Tuned Mufflers, Jackpot 2-1-2 head pipe, stage 1 air cleaner & PCV.
http://www.fuelmotousa.com/09stkvsjackpottw6.jpg
Trending Topics
#8
#9
So here's a question...sent the bike in for dyno again today to tweak the PCV on my '09 UC. The end performance was 67 hp & 78 tq. Aren't those stock numbers? Would think I'd get something out of the SE breather and Rineharts. The AF table was absolutely pure across the bottom so it's a good mixture. Just wondering why it didn't produce more...the last tune (that did not allow the bike to perform well) showed 78 hp and 80 tq, but it ran like crap even though the system showed it produced those higher numbers. My shop [independent] said a few hp/tq could easily be affected by ambient temps (94 today) and that the AF tables showed it was running efficient.
Thoughts anyone?
Thoughts anyone?
Last edited by Ride Ultra; 05-23-2012 at 08:23 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post