I know there were a few Dyna owners who were considering the race fueler versus other tuners such as PCIII, Sert, etc. so I thought I would post the information after my dyno. After the dyno, the bike is still showing a rear cylinder rich code every once in a while, however "dyno dave" said it is good to go and he is going to check with tech support to see why this is happening. This was supposed to be corrected with the newest version of the race fueler. He was impressed with the numbers for a mostly stock bike...Is it the bct baffles?
The Bike: 2006 Dyna Street Bob, Stage I Download, SE A/C with open air cleaner, SEII's, BCT Baffles, SE Race Fueler.Sorry I don't have a scanner, so I had to take two pictures of the dyno sheet in order to post the results.. Here you go.
jdog

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...1/DSC00628.jpg

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...1/DSC00626.jpg

 

Not as big of numbers as I'd have expected for the cost involved in this endeavor. Maybe the difference is in the drive-ability

 

Was somebody drinking??????

 

I wasn't.....I don't know what the policy is at Doc's, but I suppose you never know....
jdog

 

I dont know cowboy if those are real they look pretty good for a basically stock bike, the average would im the 70s for HP and maybe low 80s TQ.

 

Clayman,
The numbers are real.... I guess I could take a picture of the reciept for you...and the only explanation I have it that on the BCT website they claim a significant HP difference with their baffles, other than that, everything I have is the original post.
Steel cowboy, those numbers are goodfor the minor additions that I have. Look at other dyno numbers
jdog

 

I got to looking at some posts regarding dyno numbers on here and I agree the numbers seem high. If you look at the numbers before and after, there is a little bit of change, but not a significant amount... I think Mike C can confirm here in St. Louis, we have only one choice of 3 dealers with a dyno...What would cause the numbers to be much higher...than other's? Is it the dynometer? the tuner? I don't know why they would purposely skew the numbers but according to other posts, there are a lot of dishonest tuners out there...Any thoughts?
jdog

 

Those are the highest numbers I've ever seen for a basically stock bike. There are some 95 inch dyno's I've that aren't that high. Yeah, that's pretty damn good!

 

yeah, i agree, i think those look pretty dern good for mostly stock, especially w/ basically stock pipes. almost hard to believe.

 

I have a buddy who has an 06 wide glide, with download, se A/c, and big radius. He is probably going to go with a pcIII shortly and he will have to have that dyno'd at the same dealer. It is going to be interesting to see what his numbers come out at...I will keep you posted and in the meantime, I'm going to see if any others had high dyno numbers there.
jdog