Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

96'' from hell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 06:38 AM
  #51  
johnnyjellybean's Avatar
johnnyjellybean
Cruiser
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 232
Likes: 11
From: montreal
Default

duplicate post
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 08:00 AM
  #52  
Sharkman73's Avatar
Sharkman73
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 7
From: SE Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by johnnyjellybean
Here's my 07 SB with Andrews 37H and cycle shack slip ons
Regardless of which cam you choose , you should see at least 10hp and 10tq increase with a cam change and a tune.

2007 Harley Street Bob FXDB Dyna with Cycle Shack slip ons - YouTube
Just for reference, with my stage 1 breather, 222 cams, 2-1 pipe & dyno tune with SEPST, I'm +22hp/+18tq over stock.

I had it dyno tuned after the cam install with my V&H slip-ons I had before the Fat Cat & I just wasn't getting the benefit of the cams so I decided to go 2-1 while I had it in the shop & it paid off big time.
 

Last edited by Sharkman73; Mar 16, 2013 at 08:03 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 08:32 AM
  #53  
128auto's Avatar
128auto
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,114
Likes: 29
From: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Default

Don't make me swap my 555 for 222, those are impressive numbers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 11:28 AM
  #54  
Dynam1te's Avatar
Dynam1te
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 7
From: SLC, UT
Default

128auto, sharkman, johnny, thanks guys. Those are some good vids. That 555 has got quite the impressive lope, but I will be going with a 2-1 system so I'll bet they'd sound a bit different with that set up. Two very good cams for sure. I haven't decided if/when I want to do head work. I'll bet the 222's would suit me just fine, but the 555's would do the job in the long run.... So many choices and options with cam picking. Thanks for the video posts!!! Anyone have any feedback on the 204's by chance?
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 11:31 AM
  #55  
johnnyjellybean's Avatar
johnnyjellybean
Cruiser
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 232
Likes: 11
From: montreal
Default

Originally Posted by Sharkman73
Just for reference, with my stage 1 breather, 222 cams, 2-1 pipe & dyno tune with SEPST, I'm +22hp/+18tq over stock.

I had it dyno tuned after the cam install with my V&H slip-ons I had before the Fat Cat & I just wasn't getting the benefit of the cams so I decided to go 2-1 while I had it in the shop & it paid off big time.

What was "stock"? What was the baseline run before the mods.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 11:34 AM
  #56  
soft 02's Avatar
soft 02
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 66,948
Likes: 4,573
From: TOAK western branch
Default

555 with 2-1.

 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 12:20 PM
  #57  
therocket's Avatar
therocket
Advanced
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 75
Likes: 26
From: Wolcott, CT
Default

Gearing is the same for both bikes. The Fatboy is about 40lb heavier. A 40lb difference of the line can be enough to push you out front and keep you there before the Fatboy has enough time to catch up. The overall gearing of these bikes is 2.79 which can make even a heavier bike with some good mods a little lame from takeoffs. The stock cam and the SE-255 cam have pretty much the same HP/TQ profiles with the SE-255 just being more of the same as far as numbers go which a lot of guys like. I went with the Andrews 48H cam on my Street Bob and got 85hp and 100ft/lbs of torque. It's a blast to ride and will pick off many unsuspecting Big Inch motors. I know it will give my 117 ci Road King at 127hp and 130 torque fits in a short distance. Have fun with that Street Bob, I know I do!

https://www.hdforums.com/forum/dyna-...staggered.html
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #58  
therocket's Avatar
therocket
Advanced
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 75
Likes: 26
From: Wolcott, CT
Default

Sorry. Your buddy's bike is a Wide Glide and a few pounds lighter in stock form and same gearing. It must be in his tune. He may only be 5-10 more then you in best tune with the SE-255 cams.
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 12:56 PM
  #59  
Sharkman73's Avatar
Sharkman73
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 7
From: SE Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by johnnyjellybean
What was "stock"? What was the baseline run before the mods.
Bone stock on dyno:
64/78

Stage 1 breather, V&H slip-ons & dyno tuned with SEPST (done at 1,000 miles):
74/88

TW-222 cams, D&D Fat Cat w/big boar baffle & dnyo tuned again with SEPST:
86/96
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2013 | 12:59 PM
  #60  
Sharkman73's Avatar
Sharkman73
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 7
From: SE Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Dynam1te
128auto, sharkman, johnny, thanks guys. Those are some good vids. That 555 has got quite the impressive lope, but I will be going with a 2-1 system so I'll bet they'd sound a bit different with that set up. Two very good cams for sure. I haven't decided if/when I want to do head work. I'll bet the 222's would suit me just fine, but the 555's would do the job in the long run.... So many choices and options with cam picking. Thanks for the video posts!!! Anyone have any feedback on the 204's by chance?
My recommendation would be that if you think you might ever increase compression at some point, go with the TW-555 or TW-777. If you are going to keep stock compression, go with the TW-222.

I've seen a few charts comparing the Wood TW-222 to the SE-204....TW-222s make slightly better number all the way through the curve. The curves looked similar though. The SE-204s have more duration, while the TW-222 has more lift. Results appear similar, with the 222 having the edge.
 

Last edited by Sharkman73; Mar 16, 2013 at 01:02 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 PM.