Low Mileage Assumption When Buying An Older Used Motorcycle?
I may do it this year when I have new tires installed IF my wife decides that she wants to start riding again.
I had replaced the ties once ('12 I believe) and they only had a few miles on them and the bike ran flawlessly and looked better than new with heck of a lot of chrome goodies, etc., etc., etc.!
We sold it to one of my wife's friend's husband and I was escorting him/them to freeway I was thinking that the only way that the bike did NOT look like a new bike was the narrower rear tire.
A bike left in storage without some TLC may give some problems but I do take them out yearly and take them on short, local runs before giving them a bath and a leather treatment.
My '98 Heritage Softail Heritage Springer Anniversary Edition (keeper) has less than 10,000 miles on the odometer and with the exception of the digital readings in the speedo dimming. looks like a bike on the showroom floor.
You cannot assume every low mileage bike is a deal and you should run from every high mileage.
We traded in a 2010 Limited with 65k miles in 2016. One owner, never down and ALL service done on schedule. The dealer who we know very well sold the bike the day after we traded it to a guy in Surfside Beach, SC. He comes back to the selling dealer every year when visiting family and stops to tell them he's still riding and the bike is serving them very well. They like telling me when the guy stops in.
I have a friend that was NOT AT ALL interested in my 2010 Ultra. He wouldn't admit it but the miles scared him. So a few weeks later he calls me all excited. He was on vacation in Tennessee, met a guy with a 2005 Ultra for sale. He was so excited, it was a one owner, 15k miles it was an impulse buy. He gets the bike home and it starts but does not run well. Needs pretty much everything because he shared with me the bike has been in storage for several years. Well two years and $4k miles later he got sick and tired of working on it and not being able to trust it beyond 50 miles from home and purchased a new 2021 Limited. This 2005 bike had not service records. The fuel system was gummed up, the brakes were trash. The fluid looked like syrup. Rebuild and replace everything brakes. The tires were dry rotted, needed wheel bearings, spark plugs, plug wires, battery, filters, you name it. He had the primary case off three times. All for leaks and once for leak and new stator.
My best riding buddy has 150k on his 2009 Ultra and going strong. He has replaced the belt and did a 103 kit with about 80k on the bike. It's not worth anything on trade, but it starts and runs great. He did some overnight rides with us last year.
I think if a bike is actually ridden on the road at least 20 miles or so regularly it is far better than one that has sit for long periods of time. If the owner keeps up with service as needed even though he is not racking up a lot of miles then it is a bike I would consider.
We ran into an old friend weekend before last that is 88 years old and still riding. He put 417k miles on a Ultra in the 90's. It was replaced and he owns that bike today with 388k miles. He has two other bikes that are not Harley's with 200k miles on each!
My 2017 CVO has 45K miles on it now. It's paid for, setup exactly how we like it and too nice to even consider trading. I look forward to the day it clicks over 100K miles because that'll mean I have many more enjoyable adventures and memories.
Mileage is just a number.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I read its age (say a decade or more), counteracts its low mileage, as low mileage does not constitute a more valuable bike nor make or break a good used motorcycle, that has sat for most of its life...















