Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Twin Cam 103 Cam shootout 20 different camshafts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2020 | 07:14 PM
  #21  
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
Thread Starter
|
Platinum Sponsor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 4,278
From: Little Chute, WI
Default

Originally Posted by kblhd
What bump in HP and torque do you generally see with Fuel Moto B heads? Looking to do a 103, level B heads and CR 570-2. With only 30,000 not looking to increase bore.
Originally Posted by Bafflingbs
Same question, with Woods 222’s
Generally speaking in a 103 application with a fairly short cam like the CR 570-2 or TW-222 we generally see about 10% increase in horsepower and about 5% increase in torque with our Level B heads. This will of course depend on the exhaust system and the rest of the combination
 
__________________


Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com










Reply
Old Jan 16, 2020 | 08:25 PM
  #22  
Bafflingbs's Avatar
Bafflingbs
Stellar HDF Member
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 925
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by fuelmoto
Generally speaking in a 103 application with a fairly short cam like the CR 570-2 or TW-222 we generally see about 10% increase in horsepower and about 5% increase in torque with our Level B heads. This will of course depend on the exhaust system and the rest of the combination
Fat Cat, of course... That would include .040” head gaskets and decking the heads -.005”
 

Last edited by Bafflingbs; Jan 16, 2020 at 08:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2020 | 10:03 PM
  #23  
kblhd's Avatar
kblhd
Road Captain
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 557
Likes: 169
From: Nevada
Default

Originally Posted by fuelmoto
Generally speaking in a 103 application with a fairly short cam like the CR 570-2 or TW-222 we generally see about 10% increase in horsepower and about 5% increase in torque with our Level B heads. This will of course depend on the exhaust system and the rest of the combination
Thanks for the quick reply!
 
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2020 | 12:04 PM
  #24  
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
Thread Starter
|
Platinum Sponsor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 4,278
From: Little Chute, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Bafflingbs
Fat Cat, of course... That would include .040” head gaskets and decking the heads -.005”
With headwork we would set the combustion chamber to achieve the intended compression for the cam being utilized and use a .030 head gasket. With the right pipe, headwork, & cam you'll have a winner
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2020 | 04:43 PM
  #25  
shineola's Avatar
shineola
Tourer
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 482
Likes: 36
Default

I think it’s a shame that the E pipe is going away I was lucky enough to get one for a late model touring bike. Certainly not the biggest baddest pipe out there .... the charts speak for them self’s as as far as usable torque in the everyday cruising range where most of us ride. The fact that is also is adjustable via the end cap and somewhat tame in sound compared to a lot of the other pipes that are popular now. I been running these E-pipes since the late nineties 😏
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2020 | 04:53 PM
  #26  
470004's Avatar
470004
Seasoned HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 24,815
Likes: 19,324
From: New York
Default

Thank You Fuel Moto USA. Great information.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2020 | 07:08 PM
  #27  
GearheadMike's Avatar
GearheadMike
Road Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 934
Likes: 1,050
From: So Calif
Default

Thanks for everybody's hard work!


I took 'Totalgearhead's' spreadsheet, copied this area, and added some color, and totals, so I could compare these better than the graph.
 
Old Jan 26, 2020 | 07:48 AM
  #28  
Bafflingbs's Avatar
Bafflingbs
Stellar HDF Member
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 925
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by GearheadMike
Thanks for everybody's hard work!


I took 'Totalgearhead's' spreadsheet, copied this area, and added some color, and totals, so I could compare these better than the graph.
Now this is what I’m talking about! Great graph! I guess my 222’s really are all that and a bag of chips
 

Last edited by Bafflingbs; Jan 26, 2020 at 08:00 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2020 | 02:12 PM
  #29  
Steve Helton 2's Avatar
Steve Helton 2
Cruiser
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 188
Likes: 37
From: Big Rock Va
Default

Thanks Jamie for your work good comparisons.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2020 | 04:53 PM
  #30  
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
Thread Starter
|
Platinum Sponsor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,283
Likes: 4,278
From: Little Chute, WI
Default

Originally Posted by shineola
I think it’s a shame that the E pipe is going away I was lucky enough to get one for a late model touring bike. Certainly not the biggest baddest pipe out there .... the charts speak for them self’s as as far as usable torque in the everyday cruising range where most of us ride. The fact that is also is adjustable via the end cap and somewhat tame in sound compared to a lot of the other pipes that are popular now. I been running these E-pipes since the late nineties 😏
The E-Series pipes are not going away, we are however currently backordered on the Twin Cam FLH version. We have them in production and will have more E-Series 2/1's available later this winter. We love these pipes as well for the same reasons you are stating
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.