Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

progressive monotubes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 06:44 AM
  #31  
Ben E's Avatar
Ben E
Road Captain
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 646
Likes: 5
Default

Did mine 3 weeks ago. Impressed and pleased with improvement in dive and general handling. Its significant but not holy s#&t better than stock. Well worth it for average rider like me. Onward to the ohlins ( or JRIs)...??
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 09:50 AM
  #32  
07fsxt's Avatar
07fsxt
Cruiser
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 3
From: Kansas
Default

I’ve read allot about the improvement in brake dive and handling with the Monotubes, but I can’t find much information on how the Monotubes actually soak up road imperfections (expansion joints, pot holes, etc.).
On a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being stock.
How do the Monotubes handle slow speed (less than 30 mph) bumps?
How do they handle highway speed bumps?
Do they absorb holes better than heaves?
Thanks for any info.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 04:00 PM
  #33  
Hunter 1's Avatar
Hunter 1
Cruiser
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 221
Likes: 2
From: Voss,Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 07fsxt
I’ve read allot about the improvement in brake dive and handling with the Monotubes, but I can’t find much information on how the Monotubes actually soak up road imperfections (expansion joints, pot holes, etc.).
On a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being stock.
How do the Monotubes handle slow speed (less than 30 mph) bumps?
How do they handle highway speed bumps?
Do they absorb holes better than heaves?
Thanks for any info.
I`m curious about the same things, I`m thinking about putting them on my RK.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 05:09 PM
  #34  
stupid_rope's Avatar
stupid_rope
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,196
Likes: 14
From: Satans Asshole
Default

im not about to put a number on them...thats dumb. they vastly improve your handling at all speeds, and when coupled with some ohlins or JRIs or hell, even some progressive rears, the whole bike rides great compared to stock.

its all relative. spend the $300 and enjoy. oh, and theres no need to change fork fluid either.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 09:46 PM
  #35  
trafficjams's Avatar
trafficjams
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 2
From: Ma
Default

Love mine. Should be the standard.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 12:56 PM
  #36  
djl's Avatar
djl
HDF Community Team
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,763
Likes: 2,596
From: san antonio
Community Team
Default

Originally Posted by 07fsxt
Been there, done that. I am almost ready to bail out on the R/T spring, emulator setup after having the forks off the bike three different times with vary little improvement over the stock ride. The forums have been allot of help with this matter, but its just to much trial and error for me. The real ******* is that I don't know if I will be any better off going with the Monotubes. Oh well its only money, right.
I think the monotubes would be fine for the average rider but if ridden aggressively, I see the bike blowing through the suspension when hitting rough spots at lean angle going through a turn just like the stock suspension does.

I know the R/T setup can be a PITA but how much time did you spend on the phone with the R/T tech guys before setting it up? How much time did you spend talking to guys that run R/T or Ricor upgarded suspensions? I have been investigating the alternatives to suspension upgrades that way for over two months and I still haven't decided which way to go. I can tell you that if I should opt for the monotubes, I will wait for the units that can be serviced rather than replaced.

You are right when you say it's only money. Money is the only thing keeping me from springing for the Traxxion monotube setup; competely adustable but at $1400 a pop, I will have to think long and hard about it. My knee dragger buddies swear by the Traxxion units.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2012 | 04:03 PM
  #37  
davedyna's Avatar
davedyna
Tourer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 329
Likes: 9
From:
Default

Ditto on not doing the 1-10 rating system but to me the Monotubes shine the most when it comes to cleaning up brake dive (and this is exactly why I bought them). Personally, as far as improved ride handling over bumps etc. I would give them a small improvement over stock but this is not a cadillac ride improvement. Also, I swear you get a tiny bit of noise with the tubes from time to time (maybe a bit thicker fork oil would stop this entirely) sort of like they are tapping on the fork tube (please don't make more of that than it is, it is not a big deal type of thing). For me, they were definitely worth the spend especially since it is a relatively cheap uptick.
 

Last edited by davedyna; Dec 7, 2012 at 04:04 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2012 | 07:29 AM
  #38  
mcw999's Avatar
mcw999
Cruiser
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 14
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Ben E
Did mine 3 weeks ago. Impressed and pleased with improvement in dive and general handling. Its significant but not holy s#&t better than stock. Well worth it for average rider like me. Onward to the ohlins ( or JRIs)...??
Agreed. Had mine put in a few months back. I wanted less dive on braking, and achieved that result. Handling is better but tough to quantify. Looking at rear shocks now.

Had the dealer do the install, which turned out to be a good thing, because the top nut on one of the forks was cross threaded (had to be that way from the factory) and taking it off ruined it. Warranty covered the new parts.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2012 | 08:23 AM
  #39  
Boyer8's Avatar
Boyer8
Cruiser
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 1
From: Harrisburg, PA
Default

I did mine 2 weeks ago. What a difference they make!! Now I just have to figure out what I'm gong to do for the rear shocks.
 
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2012 | 06:49 PM
  #40  
07fsxt's Avatar
07fsxt
Cruiser
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 3
From: Kansas
Default

Ok, Ok, Nobody wants to go with the 1 – 10 rating system. That might have been a little over the top.

Djl, I did my research also with the tech guys at R/T and Ricor. So much, in fact that I started getting conflicting information from R/T on the springs. If you go with the R/T springs, my advice would be to error on the heavy side of the spring calculator. Example--- If your weight falls between .90kg and .95kg go with the .95kg springs.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.