57h cams over Rushmore
Tourer
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 435
Likes: 1
From: St. George, Utah
The cams in TC Rushmores are a 254E. That is a different grind than a 255. It is closer to a TW222. I am going to keep the 254E and installing jackpot headers and target tune wideband with powervision. Stage 1 intake is already installed. That should put more pep in my step.
Cruiser
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis IN.
I don't know where you got infro that the stock 103 has 254E cams but its not what I had taken out of my 103
They are a cheap pressed lobe cam
maybe you talking CVO units?????
not 103 regular bikes
254E is a ground one piece unit
I believe specs on cam are not same also
They are a cheap pressed lobe cam
maybe you talking CVO units?????
not 103 regular bikes
254E is a ground one piece unit
I believe specs on cam are not same also
Tourer
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 435
Likes: 1
From: St. George, Utah
I got it straight from the dealer. I have a spec sheet on it in my lap. The Moco is selling these cams now, $329.
Grand HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,917
Likes: 184
From:
I have the 57 cams but I think I'm going to a 2-n-1 Rush Wrath to bring the low end back up. I've saw 3 dyno's from other bikes with a 2-n-1 and they bcame on like gang-busters with these pipes. I love the cams but want it to come on sooner.
Does the TC-103 have a different cam than the non-TC? I seem to recall it does thanks to the bump in compression.
Road Master
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 817
Likes: 380
From: Central Ohio
SE book says .511" lift for 2014 103 setup. They are closer to the 255 cams, with 2° less duration and less lift (.556" for the 255). And the intake closing is 5° sooner on the 255. Honestly I'm not sure why they even make the 254, seems useless, and can't be much (if any) more beneficial than the stock 103HO or 255 cams.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Tourer
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 435
Likes: 1
From: St. George, Utah
The Andrews 57h is a good cam for baggers. I had 48h on my 2010 96ci motor and it really woke it up and ran real well. Andrews 26h is also a good cam on 96 or 103 for a bolt on cam. Uses stock lifters,springs,heads etc. I will evaluate the stock 254e cam in my Rushmore with target tune and powervision and FuelMoto will give me the right map for how my bike is set up. I want a dyno sheet on it when I'm done, but I'm to far from FuelMoto. I am 100 miles from Dynojet and will take it in there. I think the 254e is very close to TW222 specs so if the tune gets my bike up in that range, I will be quite pleased. All the cams from Harley are set for smog/EPA compliance.
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,532
Likes: 132
From: SoCal
SE book says .511" lift for 2014 103 setup. They are closer to the 255 cams, with 2° less duration and less lift (.556" for the 255). And the intake closing is 5° sooner on the 255. Honestly I'm not sure why they even make the 254, seems useless, and can't be much (if any) more beneficial than the stock 103HO or 255 cams.