When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This really isn’t that tough of a decision. They are really built differently in terms of geometry. If you look at the fork angle, trail and lean angles you will find one is built for spirited riding and one is built for lazy relaxed riding. From there you can see they are completely different in terms of style. You can’t just look at the bags on them and assume they are similar as they are completely different and you have to decide what type of riding you do and what style you prefer.
This really isnt that tough of a decision. They are really built differently in terms of geometry. If you look at the fork angle, trail and lean angles you will find one is built for spirited riding and one is built for lazy relaxed riding. From there you can see they are completely different in terms of style. You cant just look at the bags on them and assume they are similar as they are completely different and you have to decide what type of riding you do and what style you prefer.
Couple of thoughts... The Heritage might look like an old man's bike to some, but it ain't no slouch. Regardless, they are both "cruisers".
My eldest is a young man and just bought his 1st, the Nightster. Probably will trade up in a few years for the FXLRS. Back in the day when I was his age, for sure I would've got the FXLRS.
Couple of thoughts... The Heritage might look like an old man's bike to some, but it ain't no slouch. Regardless, they are both "cruisers".
Yep, we understand they are both cruisers and both big heavy Harleys. How does that help the OP decide or differentiate between the 2 bikes? I still say look at the specs, rake, trail, lean angle and that is a good indicator of their relative strengths and how they are designed to perform. From there, the next criteria is looks/style. Some like classic styling and some prefer a more modern style. Those 2 factors differentiate the 2 bikes even though they are both cruisers .as you point out.
you can ride "fast" on the Heritage if you want, the chassis is very good, the suspensions are a bit softer and more suitable for cruising, but this model is very capable in the twisties, but obviously the LRST is better suited to sporty driving with stiffer damping and better brakes, but it is also capable for touring and cruising, that's another style, more modern and I like it too, perhaps my next one to rejuvenate a little...lol...
Couple of thoughts... The Heritage might look like an old man's bike to some, but it ain't no slouch. Regardless, they are both "cruisers".
So what makes one Harley look like an "old man's bike" versus another? The spoke wheels? bags? big windscreen? For me the differentiation is between classic and modern styling as when I was younger unless the Harley you were riding was a Sportster you were riding an old mans bike. The bikes without fairings are the classic look for me which puts the Low Rider ST and Road/Street Glide firmly in the modern category. A Deluxe with white walls and my favorite color combination of Crushed Ice Pearl/Frosted Teal Pearl will have me staring for hours
Yep, we understand they are both cruisers and both big heavy Harleys. How does that help the OP decide or differentiate between the 2 bikes? I still say look at the specs, rake, trail, lean angle and that is a good indicator of their relative strengths and how they are designed to perform. From there, the next criteria is looks/style. Some like classic styling and some prefer a more modern style. Those 2 factors differentiate the 2 bikes even though they are both cruisers .as you point out.
I'd put it this way... If you are pushing it hard enough on public roads that those specs really come into play, maybe one should think twice about what they are doing. Looks and style are certainly relevant factors to consider - whatever suits one taste. The use case may be the overriding factor. Does your riding mostly consist of short runs or all day excursions? If the later, overall comfort might be a deciding factor and the Heritage might win out on that one.
So what makes one Harley look like an "old man's bike" versus another? The spoke wheels? bags? big windscreen? For me the differentiation is between classic and modern styling as when I was younger unless the Harley you were riding was a Sportster you were riding an old mans bike. The bikes without fairings are the classic look for me which puts the Low Rider ST and Road/Street Glide firmly in the modern category. A Deluxe with white walls and my favorite color combination of Crushed Ice Pearl/Frosted Teal Pearl will have me staring for hours
I've seen many denigrate the Heritage as an "old mans bike", hence the use of the phrase. Personally, I would describe it as vintage or classic - aspects that I'm a fan of. So much so that I have one sitting in my garage. But maybe I'm becoming an old man. Meh...
I'd put it this way... If you are pushing it hard enough on public roads that those specs really come into play, maybe one should think twice about what they are doing. Looks and style are certainly relevant factors to consider - whatever suits one taste. The use case may be the overriding factor. Does your riding mostly consist of short runs or all day excursions? If the later, overall comfort might be a deciding factor and the Heritage might win out on that one.
You dont have to push the bike hard to scrape the lean angle specs tell all. And yes, we all need to think about how we ride. If you felel as though the Heritage keeps you riding safer, good on ya. I dont think the short run vs. all day excursions argument applies when comparing these 2 bikes as they are both designed for extended riding with wind protection and adequate storage. I have myself done multi-state touring on Softails with no problems some 2-up. But, would agree that overall comfort is a factor.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.