When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So as I am getting ideas for my winter projects I am stuck wondering about the 2 categories. Are compenants that much better than coaxial speakers? I mean is a $200 set of components that much better than a $200 set of coaxials? If so, what is the reason? I have done alot of reading and alot of guys like components or pro audio setups. I will definitely not be going pro audio but wondering if the front stage of my bike would be that much better with components over coaxial speakers I have at this point. Thus far I have kenwood HU, as pn4.520d amp which I will probably upgrade to the pn4.1000d and a set of Polk mm652's. I need a rear speaker at this point so I could swap the Polks to the rear if components up front will be a big improvement over them. Other wise I am thinking pioneer ts-a1686r for the rear. If for under or around $150-$200 I would consider them if improvement is worth it.
I'm not sure at that price point but I can tell you I replaced a $200 set of hertz coaxial with a $350 set of components and the difference was HUGE. I think separating the tweeter allows a much fuller sound. Jmho. I'm sure a pro with pop in and steer you straight
I'm not sure at that price point but I can tell you I replaced a $200 set of hertz coaxial with a $350 set of components and the difference was HUGE. I think separating the tweeter allows a much fuller sound. Jmho. I'm sure a pro with pop in and steer you straight
Don't want to spend that much at this point. Maybe down the road. At that difference in price I would expect a big improvement. I guess I'm curious dollar for dollar ( low dollars) which is better.
Dollar for dollar components are normally better.
Most folks choose coax's for the ease of installation and price.
is there a set of components our there that are good for $200 or less with tweeters and crossovers? I don't want to drill holes in my fairing or lose gauges but if I can mount tweeter on grill I'm not against it. I work in a tool shop so if I cant do mods one of my coworkers can
I mean is a $200 set of components that much better than a $200 set of coaxials?
In that example probably not. You'd be comparing some pretty cheap components with some average coaxials.
One big advantage of components is the ability to work around the vehicles mounting locations. On a bike its not as big of a deal as a car where your fancy new coaxials are aiming at your calves - that's a good time to go components. You'll see some guys taking components and mounting them coax-style because the factory location kinda works on the bike.
Basically you have more mounting options, more power options (assuming you can bi-amp your components).
Pro audio/separates takes it even further. You can completely custom tailor your frequency range, power, location, EQ/Crossover/Timing, etc. driver-by-driver.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.