When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Those Kappas will take 125-150 watts all day long. If you are still at this point in the conversation, just jumping up and down to set your gains with a DMM, 18v will get you 125 watts and 20v will get you 150 watts. Finish it by ear!!!!!!! Do not set with DMM and leave it there.
A bit of clarification. My original question was basically how to figure out your amps output voltage when using speakers with 2.5 or 2.7 Ohm impedance since the amp manufacturers only post output at 2 and 4 Ohms. I now know that you ignore the amps output and focus on the speakers RMS rating.
I was a little frustrated so I apologize if that came across in my posts.
On a positive note, my Kappa 62.ii speakers are covered under warranty and I am getting a pair of 62.ix replacement speakers. Meanwhile my trusty old Polk MM651's are keeping the tunes flowing.
Thanks, Jim
Last edited by roussfam; Sep 21, 2018 at 08:08 AM.
Equation is square root of the product: (power x resistance). Have to first multiply watts times ohms, then take square root of that product. In the example, voltage should be square root of 270 (which is ~18).
Wrong answer of 27volts was derived by taking square root of power (100) then multiplying resistance (2.7).
When I was using the 62.ii speakers I had my amp set to all pass. I've read that I should have it set to HP and the head unit set to 80-90. Would this hold true for the 62.ix speakers as well?
When I was using the 62.ii speakers I had my amp set to all pass. I've read that I should have it set to HP and the head unit set to 80-90. Would this hold true for the 62.ix speakers as well?
But don't be afraid to set a normal volume level, play ur favorite song and very slowly adjust the HPF from 60 to 200 to hear exactly what is happening. At 60 ur letting a lot more lower freqs enter the picture thus will be volume limited due to the potential distortion those freqs bring. At 200 that sucker can get damn loud mainly because the distortion is now not limiting you however it sounds like hell because there really is not much warmth, or mid bass. A good balance seems to be 80-90 for most coax and Component speakers where u still get a bit of warmth but also the undistorted loudness required at higher riding speeds. After u set the crossover to ur liking really make sure u have undistorted sound at 3/4 volume. If u even think ur hearing distortion at this new 3/4 max volume, adjust the gains accordingly. HPF has a direct on the available gain setting you might use. Higher HPF = higher gain. Lower HPF = lower gain due to those lower freqs that are warm on the ears but distort early in the game.
U picking up what I'm laying down?
T
Last edited by Tailwind; Sep 22, 2018 at 07:05 AM.
Just reinstalled my B52 amp. Using the rapid tables linked in this thread I set my voltage to 24.64. Used 225 watts at 2.7 Ohms. (200@4 Ohms, 250@2 Ohms rating) Previously I was using 18 volts at a volume setting of 27 out of 35. I had to keep going over 27 to hear at highway speeds. With this new setting hopefully I can hear at a lower volume. My head unit has an option where I can turn off high gain, volume max of 35, and reduce it to volume max of 25. Hopefully I can live there.
jim
Originally Posted by roussfam
Voltage = square root of Watts x Ohms
My B52 is rated at 200 Watts @ 4 Ohms and 250 Watts @ 2 Ohms
Why do all the voltage calculation examples for odd impedance speakers, 2.7 for example, always show the 2 Ohm Watts X 2 Ohm, why not 4 Ohm Watts X 4 Ohms? Neither one is accurate. If 2 Ohms is 250 Watts and 4 Ohms is 200 Watts, then 2.7 is somewhere in the middle, so I assume that one calculation would be too high, the other too low?? In this example wouldnt you calculate the voltage both ways and split the difference?
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.