Primary stuff
Road Captain
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 555
Likes: 39
From: France
No problem 
I'm asking you this because i'm debating with myself about a 110" bolt in kit.. I found your HP/TQ close to what I've in mind Looking for a little more top end than my 57H but like it low end responsivness...
I'm asking you this because i'm debating with myself about a 110" bolt in kit.. I found your HP/TQ close to what I've in mind
Looking for a little more top end than my 57H but like it low end responsivness...
Club Member
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 11,413
Likes: 8,250
From: Inland NW
I see you are running the Cometic .030" gaskets. I wonder what that would do for my lame 9.2:1 110" ??
Road Captain
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 555
Likes: 39
From: France
Nice, and they even matched each pistons with cylinders ?
They are Axtell pistons made by Wossner, that's why i did'nt find them in Wossner catalog
IF static is exactly 10.80:1, then you should have 205.6 CCP & 9.77:1 CCR
Nice numbers !
They are Axtell pistons made by Wossner, that's why i did'nt find them in Wossner catalog
IF static is exactly 10.80:1, then you should have 205.6 CCP & 9.77:1 CCR
Nice numbers !
Last edited by Frédéric CM; Oct 16, 2016 at 02:14 AM.
Road Warrior
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 15
From: Bay area, CA
Well folks, after all this time and 2,300 miles since the build, I finally got it dyno'ed today, and as far as the contest goes, we have only one winner!
It has been running very well all this time, never once has it given me any problems but am pleased to report that the dyno has smoothed it out nicely, taken away some of it's two-stroke raspyness and replaced it with a bit more refined fierceness
Please discuss your thoughts on the curves but I will say it is a total hoot to ride and it hammers quite nicely
Monster is the only winner guessing Torque correctly at 123lbs. Monster, haven't heard from you in years, if you're still alive PM an address to send you your prize
No one came high enough on HP
Hp: 126
Tq: 123
It has been running very well all this time, never once has it given me any problems but am pleased to report that the dyno has smoothed it out nicely, taken away some of it's two-stroke raspyness and replaced it with a bit more refined fierceness
Please discuss your thoughts on the curves but I will say it is a total hoot to ride and it hammers quite nicely
Monster is the only winner guessing Torque correctly at 123lbs. Monster, haven't heard from you in years, if you're still alive PM an address to send you your prize
No one came high enough on HP
Hp: 126
Tq: 123
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 143
From: Palm Desert,CA
Not around much...that's an understatement! Miss you man, hope all is well
Thread Starter
|
HDF Community Team
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,754
Likes: 949
From: Out West
Thanks guys! Well I wish it didn't have that off idle dip that the chart shows, and I wish both numbers came on earlier as far as the chart shows, and I wish they were both higher in peaks, but honestly, it's a good riot of a ride
I would love to see what it would have looked/ran like if I had stayed with the plan of using the 57's. I think power in both numbers would have come on earlier with maybe even a few more points in torque and maybe 2 or 3 less in top hp due to the earlier closing of the intake.
If someone would do what I did with 57's I think they would be very pleased
Frederic, pretty close on what I get but the factors I haven't perfectly filled in in the equation are the ever so slight head milling and the piston height, which isn't much to speak of, maybe even insignificant. I think front cylinder was 10:8 and the rear 10:6, have to check my notes again.
I say though, use the 57's and if you kept the rest like mine with either the 110" kit or 107" you'd be happier than a pig in mud
I would love to see what it would have looked/ran like if I had stayed with the plan of using the 57's. I think power in both numbers would have come on earlier with maybe even a few more points in torque and maybe 2 or 3 less in top hp due to the earlier closing of the intake.
If someone would do what I did with 57's I think they would be very pleased
Frederic, pretty close on what I get but the factors I haven't perfectly filled in in the equation are the ever so slight head milling and the piston height, which isn't much to speak of, maybe even insignificant. I think front cylinder was 10:8 and the rear 10:6, have to check my notes again.
I say though, use the 57's and if you kept the rest like mine with either the 110" kit or 107" you'd be happier than a pig in mud