When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dyna Glide ModelsSuper Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
I like it. If the motor is built right, massive low rpm torque can be a treat in the twisties as opposed to frantic high rpm horsepower, in my experience. I considered USD forks on my T-Sport build years ago, but I think a literally rock solid front fork on an otherwise mediocre frame could cause problems. Like an engine build, components intended to improve handling must all work together...
I like it. If the motor is built right, massive low rpm torque can be a treat in the twisties as opposed to frantic high rpm horsepower, in my experience. I considered USD forks on my T-Sport build years ago, but I think a literally rock solid front fork on an otherwise mediocre frame could cause problems. Like an engine build, components intended to improve handling must all work together...
You really don't want low end torque. You want a flat power band. The same torque at all RPM.. Low end TQ only means the bike will fall on it's face as you go from corner to corner and you'll have to shift. Then you end up in a gear too high with no compression braking going into the next turn.
Semantics...I love roads like Lolo, Beartooth, etc if I don't have have to frantically search for the pull; just enjoying a few gears from, say, 2000 to 4000. The blue bike pictured made 100ft lbs at 2200rpm. At 608 lbs with a half tank of fuel it was a pleasure in the curves, at least for me. And the engine braking was great; coupled with the composite discs, a fast relaxing ride.
Maybe you are refferring more to a narrow power band?
Semantics...I love roads like Lolo, Beartooth, etc if I don't have have to frantically search for the pull; just enjoying a few gears from, say, 2000 to 4000. The blue bike pictured made 100ft lbs at 2200rpm. At 608 lbs with a half tank of fuel it was a pleasure in the curves, at least for me. And the engine braking was great; coupled with the composite discs, a fast relaxing ride.
Maybe you are refferring more to a narrow power band?
Looks very cool but also uncomfortable for long rides - unless you weigh about 110 lbs.
I agree that it looks cramped, mainly because of the position that the rearsets seem to be in (very high, if I'm seeing it properly)... But honestly, having spent decades on Harleys and on sportbikes, I often find it more comfortable to have my feet located under my butt on a long trip than out in front... For me, the ability to take some of my body weight in my legs instead of having all of my weight sitting on my butt keeps me from getting cramps or numb spots...
But obviously the bike in question wasn't built with long-range comfort in mind, so I guess questions of ergonomics are pretty pointless!
Oh yeah totally it's not made for riding crosscounty so it's lame.. You guys are high. Thats a good looking scoot that is tastefully done. Good thing he didn't ruin the bike with tbars and a fairing.
Semantics...I love roads like Lolo, Beartooth, etc if I don't have have to frantically search for the pull; just enjoying a few gears from, say, 2000 to 4000. The blue bike pictured made 100ft lbs at 2200rpm. At 608 lbs with a half tank of fuel it was a pleasure in the curves, at least for me. And the engine braking was great; coupled with the composite discs, a fast relaxing ride.
Maybe you are refferring more to a narrow power band?
Nope I prefer 2000 to 6500. Come out is a 20 mph turn and get to 65 mph before shutting down for the next 20 mph turn. Palomar south grade for example. You are working with a 2 to 1 Ratio High RPM to low RPM. I prefer 3.25 to 1..
Oh yeah totally it's not made for riding crosscounty so it's lame.. You guys are high. Thats a good looking scoot that is tastefully done. Good thing he didn't ruin the bike with tbars and a fairing.
I gotta ask, what did t-bars and a fairing have to do with anything? I think it's a great looking bike, but being the big bastard I am, it probably wouldn't be practical for me. I'd still ride the hell out of it but probably wouldn't do a 500mi trip with it either.
Not to mention, the bike actually has a fairing...
Go sit in the corner
Last edited by DynaKid94; Dec 31, 2016 at 02:37 PM.
They are Lyndal's; bike was built 2005-2006; before the SOA craze...
bwoltz: 2000-6500? I ride the torque curve more than the HP curve these days; not as aggressive as I used to be when I was a kid but still enjoy a brisk pace on a lonely curvy road. Have the limiter set at 6000 on my current tune
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.