When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
why does 2 into 1 exhaust giver better performance?
Dyna Glide ModelsSuper Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
You're looking at peak numbers only. Some 2-1 pipes are making 10 more hp in the mid range than a drag pipe and 5 more than other 2-2. If there was a chart for torque, you would see bigger differences. And you can and will feel 5 hp on a bike. It is equivalent to a 20-30 hp gain on a car. Most stage 1 upgrades are around 10 hp and it is night and day. You will definitely feel 5. A good 2-1 vs. a good 2-2 isn't just a difference of a rider. Same riding skills and the 2-1 will win.
You can justify anything you want in one way or another.
Bottom line, if you took 2 identical bikes except for the pipes, one would not consistently out perform the other, there are too many variables in riding for starters.
If you have ever raced it is not unusual for the very same car to never hit exactly the same time in a 1/4 mile, even on the same day with the same driver. Shift points are not always hit exactly the same etc...
It's all about matching components, tuning, and most importantly the rider/driver skills. I have seen more than 1 driver turn a 10 second car into an 11 second car and visa-verse.
The whole point as far as I am concerned for a street cruiser, pick the pipes you think look and sound best for you, if you are building a serious racer the theory behind pipe design will probably mean more to you.
You're looking at peak numbers only. Some 2-1 pipes are making 10 more hp in the mid range than a drag pipe and 5 more than other 2-2. If there was a chart for torque, you would see bigger differences. And you can and will feel 5 hp on a bike. It is equivalent to a 20-30 hp gain on a car. Most stage 1 upgrades are around 10 hp and it is night and day. You will definitely feel 5. A good 2-1 vs. a good 2-2 isn't just a difference of a rider. Same riding skills and the 2-1 will win.
When I installed the 2 into 1 (no other mods yet) the gain in mid-range torque was like night and day. I did a lot less downshifting and was able to use 6th gear a lot more. I haven't tried any other pipes on this bike but I can say the 2 into 1 kicks *** over the stock shorty mufflers...
Well i am generally a form follows function kind of guy, I am doing very little to my bike just for the sake of looks, namely the bar change, and swapping out the badges for some pan style badges that i like more.
Other then that it is performance and useability mods. That is why I asked about this, I am not really big on the 2 into one look. It is not a deal breaker for me, but i just dont dig it like i do the 2 into 2. On the other hand performance is more impoortant to me, so on my stage II bike, i dont want to give up 6%-10% of useable HP or TQ.
For me the best looking pipes are the V&H big shots black. But if i am going to take an 85hp / 100 tq motor down to a 76hp 90tq motor by using them, i wont do it.
You can justify anything you want in one way or another.
Bottom line, if you took 2 identical bikes except for the pipes, one would not consistently out perform the other, there are too many variables in riding for starters.
If you have ever raced it is not unusual for the very same car to never hit exactly the same time in a 1/4 mile, even on the same day with the same driver. Shift points are not always hit exactly the same etc...
The whole point as far as I am concerned for a street cruiser, pick the pipes you think look and sound best for you, if you are building a serious racer the theory behind pipe design will probably mean more to you.
All true...
It's all about matching components, tuning, and most importantly the rider/driver skills. I have seen more than 1 driver turn a 10 second car into an 11 second car and visa-verse.
...except the second half of this. While it is true I've seen a driver make a 10 second car into an 11 second car I've never seen it the other way around. A driver cannot make a car or bike go down the quarter mile any faster than the car or bike is capable of going. Now, maybe the car never had a driver that could "put it all together" under the ideal conditions and get the best time the car was capable of, but in the end the VEHICLE is only capable of so much.
Yes, there are a lot of variables that go into a quarter mile time but that doesn't mean that one pipe isn't going to give the bike more potential than another. You race so you know that quarter mile improvements are often measured in 1/10ths of a second thus even small improvements are still improvements.
Well i am generally a form follows function kind of guy, I am doing very little to my bike just for the sake of looks, namely the bar change, and swapping out the badges for some pan style badges that i like more.
Other then that it is performance and useability mods. That is why I asked about this, I am not really big on the 2 into one look. It is not a deal breaker for me, but i just dont dig it like i do the 2 into 2. On the other hand performance is more impoortant to me, so on my stage II bike, i dont want to give up 6%-10% of useable HP or TQ.
For me the best looking pipes are the V&H big shots black. But if i am going to take an 85hp / 100 tq motor down to a 76hp 90tq motor by using them, i wont do it.
You may actually see a higher peak HP with the big shots, but no one drives at 5500 rpms were it happens. I know everyone will add there 2 cents on rider variables and 600 hp Mustangs, but the Mustang is not running 8 individual pipes and I've seen plenty of guys run consistent times to the tenth. I used to so a lot of bracket racing. So I know both. The torque is where a 2-1 shines. Everywhere from a stage 1 to a 120R. Ask any engine builder and they will let you know how much difference pipes make. I would guarantee same stage 1 bike with same rider a thunderheader, supertrapp or pro pipe will open up 3+ bike lengths on big shots, short shots or drag pipes and do it every time. Go ask this on the engine tech section and see the answers you get.
...except the second half of this. While it is true I've seen a driver make a 10 second car into an 11 second car I've never seen it the other way around. A driver cannot make a car or bike go down the quarter mile any faster than the car or bike is capable of going. Now, maybe the car never had a driver that could "put it all together" under the ideal conditions and get the best time the car was capable of, but in the end the VEHICLE is only capable of so much.
Yes, there are a lot of variables that go into a quarter mile time but that doesn't mean that one pipe isn't going to give the bike more potential than another. You race so you know that quarter mile improvements are often measured in 1/10ths of a second thus even small improvements are still improvements.
Agreed, could have explained what I meant better on that point.
I have won races with margins as small as 20 thousandths, so yes in racing every little bit counts. On a street cruiser, not so much.
Agreed, could have explained what I meant better on that point.
I have won races with margins as small as 20 thousandths, so yes in racing every little bit counts. On a street cruiser, not so much.
Absolutely agree...that's why I have Big Shots on my Dyna. I don't need that little extra that a 2 into 1 would provide and was going for "better than stock" performance with look and sound I liked.
so yes in racing every little bit counts. On a street cruiser, not so much.
I'm not so sure it doesn't matter on a street corner, bro. This street gal once told me that just a mere two inches was the difference between an "ooh" and a "ahh"
I'm not so sure it doesn't matter on a street corner, bro. This street gal once told me that just a mere two inches was the difference between an "ooh" and a "ahh"
hehe
And with that I believe this thread has its answer.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.