When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
One thing about long strokes not discussed much is the "side load" on the cylinder when the crank is at mid stroke. A guy I used to go to the track with had a BAD *** Ironhead stroker. 4-3/4" T&O wheels, IIRC. Ran a 4"slick, was a HOT little street/strip bike. This thing blew the side of the front cylinder out and took the spigot and case with it during a run. The long rod/long stroke puts a lot of force perpendicular to the piston's direction of travel.
Now, case castings have come a LONG way since Ironhead days, but the longer strokes still push the pistons hard against the cylinder walls. This causes cylinder/piston wear more rapidly than in a lesser stroke engine.
That said, the 124" has been around for a while, now; it's not as if it ain't a proven combination... Just thinking about it in light of what I know about long arm strokers, it seems to me that an equally prepped 117 should outlast a 124.
I agree %100 with that statement. Back in my drag racing days, I use to build 383 stroker small block chevys with the stock 5.56 chevy 400 small block rods while others were doing the 5.7 and 6 inch rods. I know all about the long rods and the sidewall stress. Lot of people probably don't know and just go with the flow. Nothing wrong with long rod motors either, it's just the little things that matter to me.
One thing I'll mention about long stroke engines, ie, 4 3/4"-5" applications, is that TDC dwell, and BDC dwell time is increased as well.
With a 5" arm, when mocking up an engine, or checking with a degree wheel, you can certainly witness how FAST that piston moves once the flywheels are rotated from either postion, TDC, or bottom center.
Scott
I'm sticking to my original plan of the 117. PLENTY enough motor for me. If that doesn't work, there is little nitrous kits for just incase I ever need to play catch up. Very good info about the two motors!!
I just had a long chat with my guy. I have a 107" that is leaned on pretty good for a street bagger so I am preparing for the inevitable. 117" is the way i'm gonna go. I like 'em closer to square than where a 124" gets me. Good thing is I have the cams, TB, heads and exhaust already on my 107" that will work great on a 117". So I am giving up some low end tq currently but she is still pretty darn fun.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.