When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
I have a good tuner that has alot of experience on the dyno and with the tts just trying to figure out the best piston to use without having to cut the heads. And yes, i am having compression releases installed on the new heads. Would the 10.75:1 pistons be good for the 85-86cc stock chamber with .045 gasket? Also i thought CP made a 10.25:1?
CP may make a 10.25:1 piston for the 3.938" bore but I don't think so. Call them up to find out; good guys and easy to talk to. IIRC, Wiseco also has a 3.938" piston but I believe it is domed.
Originally Posted by bedelman
also the guy i been talking to about buying pistons says that he has a +3cc domed CP piston. Shouldnt this work the same as taking out 3cc's of the combustion chamber by decking the heads?
Making the chamber smaller has the same affect as adding a domed piston; choosing between the two would be an either/or choice as both increase compression. Doing both at the same time would be a double hit.
Both situations you outline above, i.e., a 3cc domed piston or the 10.75:1 piston with an 85-86cc chamber and .030" head gasket will put CCP just over 200psi and corrected CR at about 9.6. Pushing the envelope for me on a "street" motor but it should be a runner. You could drop both CCP and corrected CR into a more "comfortable" zone with a .040" head gasket but that's your call.
I'm thinking a +3 cc piston with stock head gasket should get what I need. I want it to move but I also want to have a reliable motor. Any thoughts on why this wouldn't be a good fit?
Originally Posted by djl
Both situations you outline above, i.e., a 3cc domed piston or the 10.75:1 piston with an 85-86cc chamber and .030" head gasket will put CCP just over 200psi and corrected CR at about 9.6. Pushing the envelope for me on a "street" motor but it should be a runner. You could drop both CCP and corrected CR into a more "comfortable" zone with a .040" head gasket but that's your call.
Did you read my last post? Your call, 3cc domed piston, .030" head gasket, 85-86cc heads and CCP about 200psi and corrected CR about 9.6; still manageable just a bit on the high side. With a good tune and compression releases, it would be a runner and squish is still under .040" which I like. The same setup but with a .040" head gasket doe back off the CCP and corrected CR just a hair even lower and with the stock head gasket even lower. With a proper tune, the motor will be a runner either way and not trying to talk out of the higher compression configuration. Your compression releases need to be working though for either setup.......
Nope. Final drive on a 2010 FLHTCU is 32/68. This SE259 cam dyno bike lists a 31 pulley that must have been installed (it's listed in the dyno run details). So minus 3% from that sh^tty SE cam sets results. plus decked heads and still so so lower end. give me a break.
You have that wrong. The bike with stock gearing 32/68 will show a higher tq/hp number than a bike with 31/68 gearing.
You have that wrong. The bike with stock gearing 32/68 will show a higher tq/hp number than a bike with 31/68 gearing.
You got me there. That's true.
Rate of acceleration would increase with the less tooth pulley being a torque multiplier. I have seen that mod increase peak tq in certain applications on a dyno but never hp. But technically yes number should not increase but come on sooner.
That SE cam still sucks down low.
Not a big fan of HD cams, although the SE204, 211 and 259 are decent runners if setup properly. Two charts in this thread showing 100TQ line crossing between 2250 and 2500 rpms; far from "sucking" IMHO. Are there better aftermarket cams? Absolutely, but for any variety of reasons some prefer to stick with the HD branded stuff. Pretty plain to see that the MoCo is upping their game when it comes to performance with the successful intro of the bolt in 110" and 117" kits which are doing very well and putting up some decent numbers. We will see what the 2017 models bring but I expect to see some major changes in '17 and '18; the TC motor is getting long in the tooth............
I actually Was a big fan of the SE stuff until I got a bad build last year. That being said I wonder if the bigger problem most people have is the Tune.
I actually Was a big fan of the SE stuff until I got a bad build last year. That being said I wonder if the bigger problem most people have is the Tune.
That has been the experience in my area. There are four dealerships within a 25 radius in my area and two of the dealerships have dynos. There is one of the best tuners in the country within that radius and 75% of the tunes he does are re-tunes of bad dealer tunes. He used to do a dyno day on the second Saturday of the month; $30 gets a couple of pulls, a chart and some suggestions on how to improve the tune; no tuning. Most of the guys that show up are guys that have had builds done at a local independent or a dealer and are not happy with the tune and think the motor should perform better; they are usually right. Dealerships do not have a good track record of tuning dealer builds which is the point I think you are making.
I should ease up on SE parts/cams. There has been improvements. It's hard to change my ways but I can keep trying.
I get where the bias comes from but there does appear to be some hope on the horizon. The MoCo can only take the antiquated air cooled pushrod vtwin design so far with technological advances but it's still an air cooled pushrod vtwin. I am expecting to see something besides annual micro improvements and an ever growing line of SE parts that should be integrated into the production models in the not to distant future but, that remains to be seen.........
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.