When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
I am not sure why you think we might be arguing? No argument on 95cc for CVO or 110 heads. You asked what you were missing with the advertised compression ratio when your calcs came up with 10.06 as compared with the advertised 10.75. What was missing in your calcs was the OEM head gasket thickness and 85cc chamber volume which is what the manufacturer uses to develop advertised specs. Maybe I misunderstood your OP but did not intend to start an argument.
No argument at all. Just a disclaimer that I wasnt trying to sound like I know it all. I ask a lot of questions, sometimes on the internet someones true intentions arent completely understandable. I appreciate every answer I get.
So if I understand you correctly even though all 110 heads measure ~95cc they are advertised at 85cc?
No, I believe he is saying they are using the term SE heads, but using the 85cc measurement.
SE heads doesn't necessarily mean CVO heads. There were SE heads in the SE catalogs that never came on a production bike.
110 Heads usually come in at 95cc
103 CVO heads usually measure ~98CC
99-05 heads were typically 85 cc
06-17 96/103 heads at 86cc
Measure everything, so you get what you're looking for.
No, I believe he is saying they are using the term SE heads, but using the 85cc measurement.
SE heads doesn't necessarily mean CVO heads. There were SE heads in the SE catalogs that never came on a production bike.
110 Heads usually come in at 95cc
103 CVO heads usually measure ~98CC
99-05 heads were typically 85 cc
06-17 96/103 heads at 86cc
Measure everything, so you get what you're looking for.
I understand now. CVO heads vs SE heads. Awfully tricky of them to advertise a piston kit like that.
All performance kits are “advertised” to give the best possible outcome as most people buy on impulse from this advertising.
the only way to truly know is to cc everything yourself. Not hard to cc heads if they are off using a syringe and a liquid of your choice - I use alcohol.
All performance kits are advertised to give the best possible outcome as most people buy on impulse from this advertising.
the only way to truly know is to cc everything yourself. Not hard to cc heads if they are off using a syringe and a liquid of your choice - I use alcohol.
Personally I don't think this true. They simply make and assumption on heads used and many times they get it wrong. You could by SE CNC ported heads in 2015 that used stock heads with larger intake valves. They don't state the chamber size but imply they are close to stock. With those these numbers come out as advertised. See below.
I use alcohol too but not to CC heads..
Robin also missed the early SE heads that were 78-80 ccs.
BTW, If using the heads with bigger valves, check the valve pocket clearance. -1.1cc sounds like they are pretty small. and they may be cut for those SE CNC heads.
While some may like conspiracies, I do believe that the advertised CRs and CCs can also be off due to simple errors. For instance, Wissco screws up regular.
They state that their current one of their 4.125 , 4 inch stroke pistons are 10.5 to 1. With stock chambers they are closer to 11 to 1. Their early 10.5 to 1, 95 ci pistons were advertised as 10.5 ccs. When measured they were closer to 14ccs. Nice unexpected compression bump..
I just always assume advertised anything was meant for stock applications. There is no way to target all possible mods. There will always be variations from deck height and chamber. Always measure everything.
It's best to always cc your chambers.we use CP Piston kits here and go by dome volume,more than advertised ratio's (that said, advertised ratio's will get you in the ball park). Heads are then set at the cc amount to yield the compression ratio wanted
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.