When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
This might be a silly question but I have a stage 4 in my new 103 Street Bob, its dynoed at about 118wrhp and that's cool but I miss the refinement of the stock set up. I assume its lumpy idle and raw manners are due to the cam (SE259E going by the brochure) in the kit, is that correct? If so is there a cam that I could replace it with to get back some of that smoothness? I realize I'd have to sacrifice HP but that's cool, I'd prefer more bottom end anyway, or is only the SE cam going to work with the stage 4 set up?
The good advice Ive gotten so far is that all the components in the pro stage 4 set up work together and its not as simple as just changing the cams over. I was told a Woods TW-555 or a TW-777 might help or give it more bottom and mid range, that's great but smooth is what I'm chasing.
Just a few questions, what is the cranking pressure? What head gasket is installed? Were the pistons flush with the cylinders, or down in the hole? Did you have the bike tuned or are you just running the SE download? After some more information then your question can be answered a bit better.
You will get more useful information if you can provide the information gtrracer is asking for. However, your issue sounds more related to rideability than to the dyno sheet numbers. There have been several similar posting recently. JMHO but the 259e cam set is not a touring cam set which results in the disappointing rideability but, more often than not, a less than optimum tune makes the rideability issues worse. Check out the below post and see if Jim's post rings a bell.
You will get more useful information if you can provide the information gtrracer is asking for. However, your issue sounds more related to rideability than to the dyno sheet numbers. There have been several similar posting recently. JMHO but the 259e cam set is not a touring cam set which results in the disappointing rideability but, more often than not, a less than optimum tune makes the rideability issues worse. Check out the below post and see if Jim's post rings a bell.
I had the dealer install the kit, its the standard pro stage 4 kit, so all the parts and stats that make up that kit if you need a reference. Yes I had it dyno tuned, and that improved it a lot but its still not as nice to ride as it was before the kit was installed. I thought, well its good now after the dyno tune and the extra power and theres a lot would make up for a small loss in rideabiltiy, but at the end of the day Im not as happy riding it as I was before the kit was installed. Ultimately is the only way to get back its smooth refined manners is to change it back to stock? apart from my V&H pipes deep breather and pro tuner. Stage one I think that is and it was awesome.
I had the dealer install the kit, its the standard pro stage 4 kit, so all the parts and stats that make up that kit if you need a reference. Yes I had it dyno tuned, and that improved it a lot but its still not as nice to ride as it was before the kit was installed. I thought, well its good now after the dyno tune and the extra power and theres a lot would make up for a small loss in rideabiltiy, but at the end of the day Im not as happy riding it as I was before the kit was installed. Ultimately is the only way to get back its smooth refined manners is to change it back to stock? apart from my V&H pipes deep breather and pro tuner. Stage one I think that is and it was awesome.
There are some different cams that may work better 555/570 down low but the SE big throttle body and heads don't help drivability down low. But a good dyno tuner should be able to smooth it out, there are few good dyno operators in dealerships.
Oh I had one of the best here do the dyno and yes it made it way better but its still hunting down low wants to go. Which is great but I guess not my ridding stye. I went back to the tuner today and he said, putting it all back to Stage 1 is a bit of a shame not to mention all that money so he suggested putting torque cones in the exhaust. Ive never heard of them. A cone that goes in right at the headers, he said its worth a try, it should smooth out the bottom end and give it more down low, but of course loss from the top. That's coo,l really how often do you need to do 100mph?
Jim told me the SE map would be fine and the bike needed a gearing change for more revs. I guess he changed his mind.
Did you read the post I linked? It is rather lengthy, as Jim can be but is a follow on to his original after Lozano tuned the Stage 4 kit; Jim's words "the bike is transformed". After reading his last post, I don't believe he would say that the SE map would be fine. Peak numbers didn't change much but power under the curve and rideability were greatly improved on the dyno. I believe Jim might still like a gearing change but I believe with the improved TQ and rideability his sense of urgency for the gearing change has diminished.
Oh I had one of the best here do the dyno and yes it made it way better but its still hunting down low wants to go. Which is great but I guess not my ridding stye. I went back to the tuner today and he said, putting it all back to Stage 1 is a bit of a shame not to mention all that money so he suggested putting torque cones in the exhaust. Ive never heard of them. A cone that goes in right at the headers, he said its worth a try, it should smooth out the bottom end and give it more down low, but of course loss from the top. That's coo,l really how often do you need to do 100mph?
Any tuner that suggest torque cones, IMHO, is incompetent and returning to Stage I or stock should not be an option. Did you read the post I linked? Take a look at the difference in the curves. If your dyno sheet doesn't look like the last one posted in Jim's most recent post, your tune is not optimum. Jim is as picky a rider as I know and has been riding for 40 years and has ridden about every brand on the planet over that time. If the Lozano tune on his Stage 4 can put a smile on his face, that is saying something. There are tuners and then there are TUNERS. I still think your tune is the problem; we need to find you a skilled tuner. Where do you live?
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.