Is an Evo capable for us?
The origional owner was a multi millionaire who used a specialist dealer to import this bike as he wanted fuel injection, which wasn't an option here back then. He then rode it a bit, then stored it in a heated garage for years. When he died, his widow sold it to the current owner who again collects vehicles but doesn't ride them much. Because we have so much bad weather here & salty roads in the winter, it's easy to tell the mileage is genuine.
Thanks again, I'll post some pics when I pick it up
It cheers me to know there are still thousands of Evo's out there with similar histories.
Evo all the way.
She pretty much goes every were with me so we do alot of 2 up riding, kinda wish she didnt like to ride so much!! If you buy the bike be sure to try and post some pics for us and good luck!
The highest roads in Europe seem to come in at 6,500 feet but the highest in the UK around 2100 so he's not going to run out of breath.
The cam, perhaps the gearing (count the teeth in the rear pulley), is all set up for emissions laws not best riding.
If I am going to be brutal, it sounds like the original owner didn't real know what he was doing going for an early fuel injection model (it's not as good as current systems and many folks swop them out for carbs), so I would not expect all the good stuff to be done.
Personally, I find a stock 1340 tourer pretty uninspiring and flat performance wise, and I would be more concerned about the brakes etc. You can fix them up to be more than adequate but it all adds up on your price which I mention as it might be good negotiation.
I think really old low mileage bikes are a misleadingly attractive because likely you'll discover all the same decay is present, e.g. crumbling rubbers, hard tyres and seals etc. I don't think they are worth what people ask for them as they are also not "collector's" bikes yet and I don't think ever really will be for a long time.
Don't get me wrong, I like Evos but they are just old bikes now, fairly crude, and at the level of a "good deal" now. They are still good foundations but you've then got to equate that into the fix.
I've deal with such a case (widow/estate of stupid rich harley fetishist keeping bike in carpeted, heated room as a decoration) and walked away from it as I found them to be unrealistic about what they had, and what it would cost to put back on the road.
You might be able to buy a much easier upgrade Twin Cam and a paint job for what it might cost to 'really' fix it up.
What's the price?
I would not pay over the odds for a pretty paint job - which is probably all the wife can see.
This +++++++1. !!
I've always wondered why everyone wants to have big inch motors.
More vibration more wear and tear..
When all they have to do is downshift.
Just like you do in a semi.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
The highest roads in Europe seem to come in at 6,500 feet but the highest in the UK around 2100 so he's not going to run out of breath.
I think that's closer to the real answer. Sadly, I'd guess those kinds of collector's bikes - while great foundations to build on - have not had all the "required" work done on them that a rider's bike would have had.
The cam, perhaps the gearing (count the teeth in the rear pulley), is all set up for emissions laws not best riding.
If I am going to be brutal, it sounds like the original owner didn't real know what he was doing going for an early fuel injection model (it's not as good as current systems and many folks swop them out for carbs), so I would not expect all the good stuff to be done.
Personally, I find a stock 1340 tourer pretty uninspiring and flat performance wise, and I would be more concerned about the brakes etc. You can fix them up to be more than adequate but it all adds up on your price which I mention as it might be good negotiation.
I think really old low mileage bikes are a misleadingly attractive because likely you'll discover all the same decay is present, e.g. crumbling rubbers, hard tyres and seals etc. I don't think they are worth what people ask for them as they are also not "collector's" bikes yet and I don't think ever really will be for a long time.
Don't get me wrong, I like Evos but they are just old bikes now, fairly crude, and at the level of a "good deal" now. They are still good foundations but you've then got to equate that into the fix.
I've deal with such a case (widow/estate of stupid rich harley fetishist keeping bike in carpeted, heated room as a decoration) and walked away from it as I found them to be unrealistic about what they had, and what it would cost to put back on the road.
You might be able to buy a much easier upgrade Twin Cam and a paint job for what it might cost to 'really' fix it up.
What's the price?
I would not pay over the odds for a pretty paint job - which is probably all the wife can see.
Myself. . I'm not interested in speed anymore.
I don't even get on the interstates. I just cruise the backroads of Missouri and arkansaw.
If i need more power for a long steep hill.......i simply downshift.
I'll never buy another bike newer than 1998.
Prefer the pan/shovel /evo by far. Wayyyy better motorbikes.
Last edited by buckweet; Jul 20, 2015 at 03:55 PM.
I guess it's a reflection on today's speeds on the interstates where it would be useful to have a little more responsiveness (and a little more brakes). But ride it as it was intended, at 65mph, and it's fine.
I wonder how the original poster got on?
The one think Harley does really well is paint jobs, but that does not go as far as frames and swing arms. They could do with cleaning up the welds more, and perhaps using a couple of coats or treating the metal first, because they rust badly from all the splatter.






