When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's still an 80"er.
Currently not enough cranking pressure but things are underway to solve that.
It's the roll on at hwy speed that I don't think is strong enough.
A set of SE heads on stock pistons ups the compression to around 9.4 and coupled with a nice cam can make that 80"er really scream. We did that to a 98 dresser before we ran across another 113" to drop in it. Ran really nice though.
Nice.....Cam? Yea that's gonna be a tuff one. I do know that a W6 loves 10:1.
Right now I'm thinking the EV 3 or S&S 510
The EV 3 has higher TDC lift which means it gets more air/fuel into the combustion chamber each time.
S&S 510 had really good numbers.
Like I said still thinking.
I have a couple months to make a decision.
Look up the numbers of a Mackie 580, high lift, longer duration, quick intake valve closing Hmm? Lift and duration of a higher rpm cam but intake closing of a compression builder. Gave my buddy the cam to put in a 80" 10-1 engine and it is a runner, it will embarrass some big engines
Look up the numbers of a Mackie 580, high lift, longer duration, quick intake valve closing Hmm? Lift and duration of a higher rpm cam but intake closing of a compression builder. Gave my buddy the cam to put in a 80" 10-1 engine and it is a runner, it will embarrass some big engines
Trying to stay with the bolt in cams.
I figure less strain on the valve train is a good thing in the long run.