EVO All Evo Model Discussion

Lesson learned....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 12:51 PM
  #11  
Beemervet's Avatar
Beemervet
Ultimate HDF Member
Veteran: Army
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 444
From: Ohio
Default

Bigger tires = more money, plus mods to make it happen. Negligible performance improvement. Yes, more meat looks great, but I'm another who has stepped back.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 02:23 PM
  #12  
aces&8s's Avatar
aces&8s
Seasoned HDF Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,570
Likes: 590
From: almost there
Default

If she has nice jugs don't worry the new owner will get tired of that too. Moral of the story, big jugs arnt worth the expense
 

Last edited by aces&8s; Feb 18, 2018 at 02:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 02:23 PM
  #13  
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
Thread Starter
|
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 5
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 20,960
Likes: 7,487
From: Poolville
Default

Originally Posted by texashillcountry
FWIW I went back to a 130 just because it was easier to get the 130 in instead of the 140.
10mm just didn't seem worth the extra trouble to me.

No way in hell would I have spent that kind of money trying to get a 150 in there and one of my favorite hobbies is wasting money on my bike!!!
I've never had an issue with a with a 140.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 02:27 PM
  #14  
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
Thread Starter
|
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 5
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 20,960
Likes: 7,487
From: Poolville
Default

Originally Posted by aces&8s
If she has nice jugs don't worry the new owner will get tired of that too. Moral of the story, big jugs arnt worth the expense
Yea eventually we all get "bored" with our jugs...
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 03:31 PM
  #15  
Ruggs59's Avatar
Ruggs59
Road Master
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 103
From: Ghent NY
Default

I always thought that having both tires the same size was best. I have nothing to back that theory up but thats what i believe. In my case thats 130 tires
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 04:00 PM
  #16  
Prot's Avatar
Prot
Club Member
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 22,826
Likes: 17,836
From: Lafayette, Louisiana
Riders Club Member
Default

FWIW, the 2018 Fat Boy has a 240 on the rear and a 160 on the front.

It also has a headlight nacelle that looks like the rear end of a Labrador.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2018 | 08:16 PM
  #17  
langwilliams's Avatar
langwilliams
Elite HDF Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,830
Likes: 302
From: Lorain Ohio
Default

been there...done that....a 5 mm or 1/4" pulley spacer should allow you to run the orig 1.5" belt. I ran a 170 under my first softail with a 1" belt..I had to space the belt to the point it almost touched the swing arm.

you could check it before ditching that 150 tire pretty easy.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 04:07 AM
  #18  
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
Club Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45,429
Likes: 2,896
From: Bedford UK
Cool

Originally Posted by Ruggs59
I always thought that having both tires the same size was best. I have nothing to back that theory up but thats what i believe. In my case thats 130 tires
In the pioneering days that was certainly the case, with only one size of inner tube required for roadside repairs - remember them?! Also fine when riding mostly solo. With the middle-aged spread we've all put on and with riding two-up being more popular, that rear 130 is on the limit, load wise. I confirmed my suspicions some years ago, talking to Avon engineers at a UK bike show, when they recommended using their 140 rear instead, as it has a slightly higher load rating.

Throughout my Harley ownership I've also owned other brand bikes, none of which have used the same size tyres on both wheels. Buttercup is typical of sporty bikes and has a 120 front, with 180 rear. One of the reasons for going with my 160 rear is to increase yet further the load rating for the rear tyre. Mrs B and I are, as best I can judge, bang on the limit for old Glide, although I wouldn't risk suggesting we go to a local vehicle weighing station to find out!
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 07:09 AM
  #19  
texashillcountry's Avatar
texashillcountry
Dirt don't hurt
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 21,059
Likes: 4,534
From: Haslet Texas
Default

Originally Posted by grbrown
In the pioneering days that was certainly the case, with only one size of inner tube required for roadside repairs - remember them?! Also fine when riding mostly solo. With the middle-aged spread we've all put on and with riding two-up being more popular, that rear 130 is on the limit, load wise. I confirmed my suspicions some years ago, talking to Avon engineers at a UK bike show, when they recommended using their 140 rear instead, as it has a slightly higher load rating.

Throughout my Harley ownership I've also owned other brand bikes, none of which have used the same size tyres on both wheels. Buttercup is typical of sporty bikes and has a 120 front, with 180 rear. One of the reasons for going with my 160 rear is to increase yet further the load rating for the rear tyre. Mrs B and I are, as best I can judge, bang on the limit for old Glide, although I wouldn't risk suggesting we go to a local vehicle weighing station to find out!


I'd have to agree with you on that one unless you like sleeping on the couch!!!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 08:41 AM
  #20  
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
Club Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45,429
Likes: 2,896
From: Bedford UK
Red face

Originally Posted by texashillcountry


I'd have to agree with you on that one unless you like sleeping on the couch!!!!
Indeed - very understanding!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 PM.