When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Bigger tires = more money, plus mods to make it happen. Negligible performance improvement. Yes, more meat looks great, but I'm another who has stepped back.
I always thought that having both tires the same size was best. I have nothing to back that theory up but thats what i believe. In my case thats 130 tires
been there...done that....a 5 mm or 1/4" pulley spacer should allow you to run the orig 1.5" belt. I ran a 170 under my first softail with a 1" belt..I had to space the belt to the point it almost touched the swing arm.
you could check it before ditching that 150 tire pretty easy.
I always thought that having both tires the same size was best. I have nothing to back that theory up but thats what i believe. In my case thats 130 tires
In the pioneering days that was certainly the case, with only one size of inner tube required for roadside repairs - remember them?! Also fine when riding mostly solo. With the middle-aged spread we've all put on and with riding two-up being more popular, that rear 130 is on the limit, load wise. I confirmed my suspicions some years ago, talking to Avon engineers at a UK bike show, when they recommended using their 140 rear instead, as it has a slightly higher load rating.
Throughout my Harley ownership I've also owned other brand bikes, none of which have used the same size tyres on both wheels. Buttercup is typical of sporty bikes and has a 120 front, with 180 rear. One of the reasons for going with my 160 rear is to increase yet further the load rating for the rear tyre. Mrs B and I are, as best I can judge, bang on the limit for old Glide, although I wouldn't risk suggesting we go to a local vehicle weighing station to find out!
In the pioneering days that was certainly the case, with only one size of inner tube required for roadside repairs - remember them?! Also fine when riding mostly solo. With the middle-aged spread we've all put on and with riding two-up being more popular, that rear 130 is on the limit, load wise. I confirmed my suspicions some years ago, talking to Avon engineers at a UK bike show, when they recommended using their 140 rear instead, as it has a slightly higher load rating.
Throughout my Harley ownership I've also owned other brand bikes, none of which have used the same size tyres on both wheels. Buttercup is typical of sporty bikes and has a 120 front, with 180 rear. One of the reasons for going with my 160 rear is to increase yet further the load rating for the rear tyre. Mrs B and I are, as best I can judge, bang on the limit for old Glide, although I wouldn't risk suggesting we go to a local vehicle weighing station to find out!
I'd have to agree with you on that one unless you like sleeping on the couch!!!!
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.