When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You're missing the point here, it's meant to increase performance on the Evo platform, not install a M8 drivetrain.
That Ultima you have is pretty much a TC top end on a larger bore beefed up Evo case, why did they build that?, because the heads are better and more displacement.
Why do the same thing with the M8 heads?, because the heads are better, bone stock will easily support 140hp and you get dual plugs and ACR's to boot, mosey over to Ebay and pick up a set for about $300.
I'm sure the cooling could be utilized,,,, if needed, lets wait and see.
I’m in no way saying that this won’t prove to be an awesome upgrade.. Or that it won’t make sense to do. I’m merely trying to understand and see quantifiable proof. My questions are not meant to sound challenging or skeptical, they really are me trying to know. I guess I need to see on 124-140 cubes that the M8 Heads make more power than aftermarket EVO heads. If they do… then I get that. But I don’t know that they do? I’m not saying that they don’t, only that I haven’t seen that as a known average.
If a measure of reliability is needed and it’s a street/strip application I haven’t personally seen the 4 valves created on average more than the 1.2 per cube number we already have from EVO & TC. Sure I’ve seen them make more than 1.2 but reliability went out the door same as an EVO.
The big advantage I see with M8 is it isn’t an after market solution… it’s Harleys base that’s making the 1.2 per cube at the 114-135 inch motors.. so that’s impressive. With this scenario, that advantage isn’t still there… you’re building largely from aftermarket already.
I’d like to try an M8 one day. But I want to try it because I think the water and oil cooling is the right direction and will lead to greater longevity with that 1.2 per cube average. My hold up is money… and wanting to wait until the magneto or other ignitions are more fleshed out and developed.
Last edited by Rains2much; Apr 25, 2026 at 11:21 AM.
If it’s not taking advantage of the oil or water cooling… no advantage there.
One thing that I question is.. What are they going to do with the cooling passages in the heads?? All M8 heads have them.. In the info provided, they mention a bigger oil pump and piston oilers but I doubt any pump that fits in the stock evo location will have enough volume to feed the heads passages.
Add an external oil pump and cooler to feed the heads?
Im in no way saying that this wont prove to be an awesome upgrade.. Or that it wont make sense to do. Im merely trying to understand and see quantifiable proof. My questions are not meant to sound challenging or skeptical, they really are me trying to know. I guess I need to see on 124-140 cubes that the M8 Heads make more power than aftermarket EVO heads. If they do then I get that. But I dont know that they do? Im not saying that they dont, only that I havent seen that as a known average.
If a measure of reliability is needed and its a street/strip application I havent personally seen the 4 valves created on average more than the 1.2 peer cube number we already have from EVO & TC.
The big advantage I see with M8 is it isnt an after market solution its Harleys base thats making the 1.2 per cube at the 114-135 inch motors.. so thats impressive. With this scenario, that advantage isnt still there youre building largely from aftermarket already.
Just want you to know that these M8 heads are now producing 1.3-1.4 hp/cube without stressing the **** out of the bottom end.. No your not building from aftermarket.. The power window is almost endless....
you need to listen to Bryan/Schex, he knows what he's talking about...
One thing that I question is.. What are they going to do with the cooling passages in the heads?? All M8 heads have them.. In the info provided, they mention a bigger oil pump and piston oilers but I doubt any pump that fits in the stock evo location will have enough volume to feed the heads passages.
Add an external oil pump and cooler to feed the heads?
That's a good question.. You don't think a HVHP pump from S&S would be able to deliver?? Their gerotors IIRC are 40% larger than stock..
Just want you to know that these M8 heads are now producing 1.3-1.4 hp/cube without stressing the **** out of the bottom end.. No your not building from aftermarket.. The power window is almost endless....
you need to listen to Bryan/Schex, he knows what he's talking about...
I’m no aficionado… I barely keep my head outta the sand to see what’s going on. Here in Florida there are a number of builders who have bragged all over YouTube building large motors over the 1.2 per cube…I’ve even gone and seen a couple in person… in less than a year they ALL without exception, I tracked down 6 known builds..they all did not last. Each of them has blown up. Now, 5-6 builds isn’t a snap shot of the industry or even an average… but it is all I have data on. I see all kinda big number dyno sheets on builds.. but I don’t here after that. I hope they’re are endless numbers of them out there making gobs of power. I just am waiting to see that. A few on this very sight have shared 10- 30k miles but those dyno sheets are also at the 1.2 threshold. That’s why I’m asking… not because I think I know better, but because I want to know that they are reliably doing it. And also was the 1.3 or 1.4 on a smaller cube and efficiency goes down as the cubes go up… or is that ratio following no matter the cube size?
I don’t remember the user name but I did see one here on this sight that was like 170 outta I think a 131 and if memory serves he was coming up on 10k miles.
Last edited by Rains2much; Apr 25, 2026 at 02:01 PM.
Oil return through a cooler as normal, then through the heads back to the tank, the same way it's done on the M8, some is better than none?
That's not the way it's done on the M8.
M8 uses a tap off of the feed side pump to the cooler and from the cooler to the heads. The head oil returns to the oil tank separate from the oil fed into the motor. It's in the service manual..
You don't want to use the return for oil cooling.. Oil is aerated. Cooling efficiency is poor.
Last edited by Max Headflow; Apr 26, 2026 at 08:32 AM.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.