Cam for bottom end
Current cam S&S 585 Thinking about a Woods W6
Would the Woods be better?
585
Intake: 20˚/45˚
Exhaust: 60˚/20˚
Intake: 245˚
Exhaust: 260˚
.585"
Intake: 102.5˚
Exhaust: 110˚
Intake: .186"
Exhaust: .179"
W-6
DESCRIPTION
.053 Timing
20/40 - 42/18 Duration .053
240 - 240 Valve Lift
.510 - .510
Lift TDC
.189 - .178 Springs
TIA Chris
W-6
Sometimes we get caught up in the advertised rpm range to the point we forget those descriptions are tempered by the size of the engine. Volume of air is required not only by power range goals but also by sheer size. 111 cubes needs more air than a w6 is designed to provide.
The difference in duration shown between the two does show power coming on lower in the rpm range with the w6.. but I’d assume even earlier it would be quiet a bit less power. You either hold the valves open longer (duration) or lift them higher. But you need a particular amount of air. The w6 on paper to me looks like a 9.5:1 to 10:1 cam for an 88” bike.
Last edited by Rains2much; May 19, 2026 at 11:33 AM.
You might go back and read my reply to your thread on the same topic 2 years ago, I'd recommend you leave the cam alone. Mine was a disappointing turd with the super E that came on it, putting a super G on it made it come alive.
Current cam S&S 585 Thinking about a Woods W6
Would the Woods be better?
585
Intake: 20˚/45˚
Exhaust: 60˚/20˚
Intake: 245˚
Exhaust: 260˚
.585"
Intake: 102.5˚
Exhaust: 110˚
Intake: .186"
Exhaust: .179"
W-6
DESCRIPTION
.053 Timing
20/40 - 42/18 Duration .053
240 - 240 Valve Lift
.510 - .510
Lift TDC
.189 - .178 Springs
TIA Chris
W-6














