EVO All Evo Model Discussion

front tire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #11  
hotrod351's Avatar
hotrod351
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 12
From: Arizona
Default

hey Schooner i just removed my brake caliper then the axle bolt on the front tire. its easy on my bike, so was the back tire to remove. not sure on yours, you have a electric glide and might have a few more things to take off. but with the manual its easy.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #12  
Buddy7394's Avatar
Buddy7394
Tourer
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 328
Likes: 72
From: SE TN
Default

shouldn't have to remove tires to remove fenders..

rear: unbolt the lower shocks & lower down wheel, disconnect wiring at the connection & unbolt fender

front: just remove bolts & remove fender
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #13  
fxstcguy98's Avatar
fxstcguy98
Road Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 4
From: Columbus, OH
Default

My 2 cents, I got Dunlop Elite III's and I really like them. Good grip, long wear, and it doesn't follow grooves in the pavement anymore.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #14  
TW's Avatar
TW
Road Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 33
From: Illinois
Default

I started out with Avons, but have been using Metzelers now for 15 years or so. Their ME-1 (Comp K) was the best tire I've ever used, but it is being phased out and replaced by the ME880, which is what I've been using for a few years now. Still better than Dunlop in that I like a soft, sticky tire. Not as much in the way of mileage like a harder tire, but way better in the performance department.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #15  
darylnj's Avatar
darylnj
Cruiser
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 177
Likes: 14
From: Freehold NJ
Default metzeler tires

94 fxds
since you guys are talking tires
metzeler has an upgrade in size for the rear 880
stock 130 upgrade 140
pro's and con's please
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 03:57 AM
  #16  
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
Club Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45,429
Likes: 2,896
From: Bedford UK
Default

Originally Posted by darylnj
94 fxds
since you guys are talking tires
metzeler has an upgrade in size for the rear 880
stock 130 upgrade 140
pro's and con's please

I have Avon Venoms on my 1990 bike. Avon also do a 140 rear and I have sized it up. Their 130 is actually 133mm wide and on my bike just polishes the belt guard when properly aligned.

Their 140 is actually 143mm wide, so to fit one I need to find 5mm or 3/16 inch of room for it. I reckon if I cut away the inside of the belt guard where that polish mark is, one will just about squeeze in! My current tyres have plenty of life in them, but I will try a 140 at the next change.

So check the specs for Metzelers and how much space you have with your current tyre.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #17  
schwangster's Avatar
schwangster
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 15
From: Qualicum Beach, B.C. CAN
Default

how much taller is a Metzler 140 to the 130?
Would it be a 140/80 instead of 130/90?
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #18  
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
Club Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 45,429
Likes: 2,896
From: Bedford UK
Default

Originally Posted by schwangster
how much taller is a Metzler 140 to the 130?
Would it be a 140/80 instead of 130/90?
If you go to their website you will find they only do a 140/90 x 16. Unfortunately they don't seem to give rolling diameters, which would answer your second question.

http://www.us.metzelermoto.com/web/c...catalog/custom

However we can work out the difference. A 130/90 is 90 percent of 130 tall, or 117mm. A 140/90 is 126mm tall, in other words either 9mm taller, or just under 3/8 inches.

Bear in mind that Avon's tyres are actually 133mm and 143mm wide, although the difference in height is about the same. I can't find the same data for Metzelers.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #19  
schwangster's Avatar
schwangster
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 15
From: Qualicum Beach, B.C. CAN
Default

Hmmm, I lowered the WG 5/8ths, and go up 3/8ths with tire diameter.
That works. Next year have to go to the 140.

I am happy with the Metzlers, front and back.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #20  
fxstcguy98's Avatar
fxstcguy98
Road Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 4
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Originally Posted by grbrown
If you go to their website you will find they only do a 140/90 x 16. Unfortunately they don't seem to give rolling diameters, which would answer your second question.

http://www.us.metzelermoto.com/web/c...catalog/custom

However we can work out the difference. A 130/90 is 90 percent of 130 tall, or 117mm. A 140/90 is 126mm tall, in other words either 9mm taller, or just under 3/8 inches.

Bear in mind that Avon's tyres are actually 133mm and 143mm wide, although the difference in height is about the same. I can't find the same data for Metzelers.
Actually, that 117 and 126 is the sidewall height, to get the diameter you have to multiply by 2 so the tires are 18mm taller which is about 11/16" (to get overall dia=rim dia. + (2 x sidewall))
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.