When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That's the other thing I wanted to know, I have no problem putting in a spacer for the 140/90, just wanted to know before hand, I realize you can only space out the rear pulley so far before you have to move the trany or space the trans sprocket. If it's only 1/8 or so, that should not be a big problem with alignment.
My belt rides in the center of the rear pulley. She has a slight pull to the left but I took her by the dealership to check it out they said she was fine.
Like I said before this might not be because of the tire/spacer. The previous owner of the bike was caught in a sandwich and rebuilt the bike (by a dealership). I'm not positive they got it right. I think the rim might be a little off.
When you put your 140 on yours I would try it without the spacer first (you may not need it) and if you don't mind let me know how it worked out.
I had a 404 on my 99 Softail Custom, and it only lasted about 6,000 miles. I have 402's on the front and rear now with about 8,000 miles on them, and they look like they will go at least another 8,000. The 404 is only rated for lighter bikes.
I could only get about 8k rear and 12k front from mine. (When I ran them)
What is your secret?
So now that I know that 130 is the proper size, and 140 will fit with a spacer, I have a lot more tire options to choose from, I'm going to stay away from the 404's I can get some Continental CM1's or Metzeler's at a good price($133), and still way cheaper than the 402's.(180+tax)
I know I'm only going to get a year out of my tires, I'm just tired if paying over 200 bucks for a so,so tire that has Harley Davidson on the sidewall.
Thanks for the help guy's.
It's not the money, but the tire, the 402's are very slippery for $200, I can't see a Metz or Cont being any worse. they may even be better, If the 402's were any good, I would gladly pay the price, I just don't think there a good value, seems like I'm paying for the Harley logo.
I don't know Texashillcountry; Maybe because I am 71 years old and don't ride very hard. LOL.
When I had my old Iron Head Sportster, I put on a set of Continental's, and they road way better than the Dunlops that I had been using. They stuck like glue and had very soft rubber. I loved them, but they wore out very quick. Dunlops are harder rubber, maybe do not stick as well, but do seem to last very well for me.
I do have a friend with a late model Fatboy, and he is only getting about 6 to 8 thousand miles on his Dunlops, but they are a special size tire that Dunlop seems to be having a problem with. Dunlop has given him at least one new tire.
It's not the money, but the tire, the 402's are very slippery for $200, I can't see a Metz or Cont being any worse. they may even be better, If the 402's were any good, I would gladly pay the price, I just don't think there a good value, seems like I'm paying for the Harley logo.
I would have to agree with you. I have heard some good things about both those brands.
You have to remember what HD stands for---hundred dollars. It seems to me that as soon as they but their logo on something the price goes up by about that much.
I do have a friend with a late model Fatboy, and he is only getting about 6 to 8 thousand miles on his Dunlops, but they are a special size tire that Dunlop seems to be having a problem with. Dunlop has given him at least one new tire.
I just had mine replaced yesterday with around 7600 miles. The rear was right at spec. I could have got more out of the front, but I'd rather replace both at the same time. I still used the same model stock Dunlops as replacements. Prior to replacement, I also checked Dunlops website and the model tires were still the recommended tire though Dunlop has another model set that will fit.
Regarding any tire issues, I spoke to the dealer about that after reading about it on the fourms a while back. They told me it was more of a mounting issue that was supposedly resolved. The tires were then cupping messing up the ride and causing a wobble. Sometimes it helps to verify tread direction.
I'm not sure if the differance between the 130 and the 140 is worth the change but I know that I had to add a 1/8 in. spacer to my axel (don't know if the rim is bent or it is because of the tire width)
because 1/2 of the tire was rubbing on the lower belt guard.
Hi, I just got a 95 FXSTC & it's got a new 140MT 90 x 16 on it. It rubs the same & so does the belt after I properly aligned it. I've searched & searched but haven't seen a solution that made sense. Let me know of anything that works, anybody?
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.