To stroke or not to stroke?
The pros of stroking your perfectly fine engine:
1. There's no replacement for displacement.
2. More HP/torque.
The cons:
1. A sizable outlay of cash for a not too sizable increase in HP/torque.
2. Must bore cases to accept cylinders.
3. Bike will be down for a while getting all of this done.
4. Did I mention that this will cost a lot of money?
Bottom line: Is it worth it to you to spend that kind of cash for the performance increase you will be getting in return? Think about it.
If you want a few more HP, buy a Thunderheader. It will probably put you over 90HP if your carb is tuned right.
However like you I wanted even more and looked into increasing bore size, to get around 106", which seemed to be possible, but eventually decided the extra costs were so high I might as well buy a fresh motor, so now have an S&S 107".
So I recommend looking closely into the costs of what you have in mind and comparing them with a new motor, bearing in mind you can go way bigger by that route! IMHO the only way to get the best out of major engine work is to have it done by a competent specialist, so everything works together. That ain't cheap!
As said above, S&S is the way to go if you need the juice now.
And as far as the strokers go - I was strongly advised against it by an oldtimer Evo guru at the local HD, so I didn't even bother...
my 2c
Trending Topics
Gotta agree with everyone, leave the Evo intact and save the coin for a aftermarket horse unless you want a stock cased engine in the bike, if that is the situation and want 100 HP, stroke away. The future comes quick and that stock engine will be nice back in lets say a 60 year old bike.
Last edited by 1997bagger; Sep 15, 2012 at 11:29 AM.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders








