When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I understand that there were a lot of changes in 1984, and that's about the least desirable year. The 1999's carry a pretty hefty price tag. I've heard bar room talk that 1990-1994 were the best years, but have no idea if that's factual.
1990 had bad cases that tended to crack
92-93 had inferior camshaft bearings
both the above should be fixed by now
early evos had 5 piece crank, later evos 3 piece crank
there is a school of thought that the earlier cranks are better and made of better quality material - but others will think other wise
personally I'd by pre 88 and get the earlier crank, but then I'm biased and have a 86 glide that's been around the clock a few times and the bottom end has never been apart
I've always been impressed with the FXRs. Best handling chassis MoCo ever built. Be aware, the FXR models came in different flavors, with different rake angles, depending on the model. If I remember correctly, the FXR had a steeper rake than the FXRS. Among the many models were: FXR, FXRS, FXLR, FXRP, FXRD, FXRT, FXRS-CONV, and the CVO versions, FXR2, FXR3 & FXR4. (I may have missed a couple in there somewhere).
Put over 90 kmi on my 1991 FXRS that ended up more an FXRT than an FXRS by the time I got done changing things up to get it where I liked it.
A couple of points about earlier posts.... The P model didn't have floorboards instead of mids, it had boards WITH mids. And all the models had the same rake, but the geometry varied with suspension height. Shocks and forks.
I could be wrong, but I remember HD specs of 29 degrees rake & 31 degrees rake for different FXR models. Kinda like these specs in the attached. I know suspension parts are different lengths, so (I'm understanding) those rake angles are strictly suspension related and not due to differing frame geometry? Never looked at it that way before, but I hear what you're saying.
yeah Hammz, like the softails the trees are raked. I have seen guys use the aftermarket VulcanWerks trees for softie springers that add an additional 7.5 degrees of rake.
Real good info here guys' thanks for your posts. That's exactly the kind of information I was hoping to get. Many thanks, and keep them coming in. I did a search prior to started this thread and wasn't able to find anything specific to the differences in FXR's. So I'm sure others will benefit from your input as well.
If you buy an fxr buy a later model they have a better transmition splined shaft. Is the best I own a 1990 fxlr and a 1992 fxrs-sp both are bad *** and I cant complain the LR I raised in the back put 13 inch shocks in the back +2 in the front changed the wheals to 9 spoke mags put p bags on it and a full fairing and put a 88 inch S&S motor in it bike is a beast I love it the sp is mostly stock minus the bars seat and pipe I love them both u cant go wrong with either fxr is still the best bike around oh I got floor boards on the sp and mids on the LR. IF U GET ONE U CANT GO WRONG
If you buy an fxr buy a later model they have a better transmition splined shaft. Is the best I own a 1990 fxlr and a 1992 fxrs-sp both are bad *** and I cant complain the LR I raised in the back put 13 inch shocks in the back +2 in the front changed the wheals to 9 spoke mags put p bags on it and a full fairing and put a 88 inch S&S motor in it bike is a beast I love it the sp is mostly stock minus the bars seat and pipe I love them both u cant go wrong with either fxr is still the best bike around oh I got floor boards on the sp and mids on the LR. IF U GET ONE U CANT GO WRONG
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Slideshow: Killer Custom's latest build relies on styling changes rather than performance upgrades, giving the cruiser an entirely different personality.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.