Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Jekill and Hyde

Thunderheaders vs. ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-21-2008, 04:27 PM
jarhead45's Avatar
jarhead45
jarhead45 is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Thunderheaders vs. ???

Maybe I should ask this over here. I have a set of Pythons on my 88 incher (06 Superglide). The Pythons are just V&H big shots but with non removable baffles. That and I hear that the Pythons have a crossover and the V&H do not. Anyways I was just wondering if the Thunderheaders would make that much of a differance over what I have. I have the oppertunity to pick a set up and I see alot of folks running them.
 
  #2  
Old 09-21-2008, 05:55 PM
new_mentor70's Avatar
new_mentor70
new_mentor70 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Diamond bar, California
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You will get a good bit of torque in the 2200 to 3000 rpm range. i swithed from the SE slip ons to the TH on my bike when it was an 88, l loved the way it ran with it.

After a HQ 95 in. kit it ran even better!!! then I went to a Rinehart 2-1 (big dissapoint ment) and then I went a D&D fat cat, a vast improvent but not quite the punch of the ThunderHeader.
 
  #3  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:51 AM
wydopn231's Avatar
wydopn231
wydopn231 is offline
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I ran pythons on evo they ran great ,but its liter and differant than touring bike.The two into one is better for low end power which a lot of guys fell is needed especaily on touring bikes.I like the sound and power combonation of thunder headers.On sporter bikes like dynas and softails I do like the look of staggered duals and dont fell your giving up a lot in power especaily if you ride hard most of the time.Now if your riding two up and behaving(riding like little old lady) which I thank all should when riding another,then Id go with the thunder header.
Hey If your getting them at good price buy them and run them you can always switch back and resale them or hell just change from time to time its easy swap hour or hour and 1/2.
 
  #4  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:12 AM
SEDELUXE's Avatar
SEDELUXE
SEDELUXE is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the t-header is one of the best 2 into 1 pipes out there.
from stock to 107ci it will perform better then any 2into 2 . it seems to run best in 95 , 103 and 107 in builds.
it is a bit loud ....
 
  #5  
Old 01-27-2010, 11:22 PM
wbirchtree's Avatar
wbirchtree
wbirchtree is offline
1st Gear
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just today put on Thunderheaders & Big Sucker Stage 1 with a powercommander V , what was stock 2009 FLHX , (California) I lost in the low end , at 3000rpms stock was around 60hp , now it's at about 42hp at 3000rpm , it did add 8 hp over all , but not till you get to about 4000rpms hits 70hp , it was about 50 degrees today so don't know how much that affects dyno , but not to happy with the result
 
  #6  
Old 01-28-2010, 11:15 AM
fripple's Avatar
fripple
fripple is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: down south
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Buy the Thunderheader (singular. Sorry it just drives me crazy when people say ThunderheaderS or FatCatS when there is only ONE pipe...LOL), you won't regret it. Good sounding and good performance....
 
  #7  
Old 01-28-2010, 03:04 PM
natural gasser's Avatar
natural gasser
natural gasser is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the mountains
Posts: 698
Received 286 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wbirchtree
I just today put on Thunderheaders & Big Sucker Stage 1 with a powercommander V , what was stock 2009 FLHX , (California) I lost in the low end , at 3000rpms stock was around 60hp , now it's at about 42hp at 3000rpm , it did add 8 hp over all , but not till you get to about 4000rpms hits 70hp , it was about 50 degrees today so don't know how much that affects dyno , but not to happy with the result
Needs a good tune.
 
  #8  
Old 01-28-2010, 07:42 PM
nathanw's Avatar
nathanw
nathanw is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Out and about
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Bassani. Quality is much better than the TH, your chrome wont flake your brackets wont break, its much better looking than the ugly duckling TH, sounds better IMO and performance is top notch.

Just realized that I created a bit of a poem there. LOL, it should be sung to anyone thinking of a TH. hahaha
 

Last edited by nathanw; 01-28-2010 at 07:44 PM. Reason: I'm a poet and didn't know it. LOL!
  #9  
Old 01-29-2010, 09:11 AM
nskitts's Avatar
nskitts
nskitts is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fripple
Buy the Thunderheader (singular. Sorry it just drives me crazy when people say ThunderheaderS or FatCatS when there is only ONE pipe...LOL), you won't regret it. Good sounding and good performance....
So, the video in your sig line where the guy says FatCats seventeen times is a joke?
 
  #10  
Old 01-30-2010, 08:12 AM
roadchaser's Avatar
roadchaser
roadchaser is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default thunderheader

I have had (3) 2-1 thunderheader pipes on 3 differant bikes.I have never had a problem with the pipe as far as chrome peeling or flaking,no problems with any brackets breaking or any problems at all.Great sounding pipe with performance!!!
I did try a 2-1 fatcat pipe with the standard baffle,never again.The pipe sounded like
s--t!! I"ll stick to the t-header.My .02 cents.
 


Quick Reply: Thunderheaders vs. ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.