Beginners Exhaust Question...
Thread Starter
|
Intermediate
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From:
Beginners Exhaust Question...
OK, after all the serious in depth discussion about exhaust systems, performance mods and the like, this question comes from one who is clueless about the more basic issues of the STOCK Harley exhaust system. I am speaking about a stock 2005 Ultra Classic here guys, and I'm looking for straight answers.
Why does the rear cyclinder split and go to both mufflers and the front cylinder go only to the right side? Doesn't this make for some sort of imbalance in the entire exhaust system? Is this the reason so many of you change out the pipes and mufflers?
Serious answers only, please. I'm trying to get educated; not flamed.
Why does the rear cyclinder split and go to both mufflers and the front cylinder go only to the right side? Doesn't this make for some sort of imbalance in the entire exhaust system? Is this the reason so many of you change out the pipes and mufflers?
Serious answers only, please. I'm trying to get educated; not flamed.
Road Captain
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 564
Likes: 1
From: Lynnwood WA.
RE: Beginners Exhaust Question...
Harley wants to balance back pressure..but its not neccessarily correct...True duals are a much better way to do it...where that pipe forms a Y..itll crack on ya anyway.
Supporter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 11
From: Ozark, AL
RE: Beginners Exhaust Question...
where that pipe forms a Y..itll crack on ya anyway.
The crossover is intended to allow the pressure to escape the rear cylinder at the same rate as the front cylinder similar to an "H" pipe in dual exhaust on a cage. The MAIN reason for using the "True Dual" type of exhaust is the looks and the difference in sound you get when you have each cylinder firing into it's own exhaust. The downside is, IMHO, most "dual" exhaust systems have a flat spot in the tourqe curve right about where a bagger cruises. If you want performance the 2 into 1 pipes seem to have the advantage over 2 into 2 systems. Most exhaust changes are all about looks and sound. my .02 cents.[&:]
Road Captain
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 680
Likes: 1
From: Seattle area
RE: Beginners Exhaust Question...
Based on many posts from those that seem to know (and a few that don't), I tend to agree with the theory behind the crossover. I think a lot of research and engineering has gone into it. I believe that it would be less expensive for HD to go with true duals IF they provided better performance. A fellow rider, however, did have the experience of the crossover pipe cracking right at the "Y" on his RK Classic, so it is apparently not unheard of. I'm also considering the V&H true duals to go with my Ovals for the look and sound, accepting the potential fall-off in performance.
-vic
2006 RK Classic
-vic
2006 RK Classic
Road Master
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
RE: Beginners Exhaust Question...
I have always been a tru dual and straight pipe man, However, after much contemplation and a lot of help from the forum, I went with a v&H 2-1 pro pipe. I can't afford the dyno and all of that, but I got a real good seat of the pants performance gain and an awesome sound. A 2-1 is not the most common exhaust you will see on a bagger, so it usually gets some good looks from other bikers.
Supporter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 11
From: Ozark, AL
RE: Beginners Exhaust Question...
I have always been a tru dual and straight pipe man, However, after much contemplation and a lot of help from the forum, I went with a v&H 2-1 pro pipe. I can't afford the dyno and all of that, but I got a real good seat of the pants performance gain and an awesome sound. A 2-1 is not the most common exhaust you will see on a bagger, so it usually gets some good looks from other bikers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skos
Touring Models
1
Apr 27, 2005 04:49 PM
