95 inch 255 cams

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 2, 2012 | 09:28 PM

trucker69

Thread Starter

Advanced

Joined: May 2012

Posts: 53

Likes: 0

From: knoxville ia

95 inch 255 cams

88 inch with big bore rhinehart td and pc III. I bought 2011 hydraulic cam plate with 255 cams would these cams be decent for my set up? thanks in advance for all help

Jul 3, 2012 | 07:45 AM

Neckball

Stellar HDF Member

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 3,108

Likes: 9

From: Lincolnton, NC

I don't think the 255's will fit the inner cam bearings in your lower case.

Jul 3, 2012 | 08:41 PM

Kaycee

Road Captain

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 564

Likes: 6

From: Wyoming USA

Neckball is right on = you will need to run a conversion cam

Jul 3, 2012 | 09:34 PM

duglaura&flhti

Road Warrior

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 1,873

Likes: 99

From: G-burg, Penna

Correct

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neckball

I don't think the 255's will fit the inner cam bearings in your lower case.

+1....need to go with a Andrews Cam Tw-26 or the Tw-37 Cams.......Awesome powerband....Good luck, D.

I chose the Andrews-26 Cam and never looked back....Killer....SE 203-204-255 or good cams but the andrews or a bit better, JMO. Best, D

Jul 6, 2012 | 10:34 AM

05RKCRider

Cruiser

Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 149

Likes: 1

From: Randleman, NC

I've run S&S, Andrews & Woods cams in my 95 DWG & 05 RKC. I had problems with first set of Andrews cams for RKC & had to send them back. They did stand behind the cams & switched them after a few calls from two wrench's in PA, the second set ran ok but I wasn't overly impressed. The S&S cams in DWG (evo) pulled hard but the Woods cams are great & pull like a freight train. They are noisy thou. Woods is a lying sack about the numbers he posts for his cams but they do work & I really like them.