Dyno results comparison?
Sponsor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,084
Likes: 829
We supplied, our Stage II Heads, and 98" piston/gaskets/boring, to surround his .583 S&S cams he already had in place.
Didn't build it, didn't tune it.
What we did do, though, is put a big smile on the owners face!
Scott
Didn't build it, didn't tune it.
What we did do, though, is put a big smile on the owners face!
Scott
Road Warrior
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 38
From: Linden, NC
But none of us spend all our time WFO. And at a certain point, you can flow 400 cfm but won't be able to take advantage of it due to limitations like throttle body size, injector size, valve sizes, etc.What was the point you were trying to make?
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,926
Likes: 138
From: NE Ohio
Not trying to lynch, just have a hard time figuring out how what is essentially a mild 98" build with a bolt in cam is out producing a bunch of 98's with more steam.
Sponsor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,084
Likes: 829
Wasn't refering to your input or questions, as you are always a gentleman.
We were quite surpised as well, when we were faxed the dyno report.
95.1 hp, and 120.0 ft/lbs.
45 Mikuni, RB 2/1, tuned at Stickly Wicked Cycles, in the San Fran Bay area.
Scott
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,926
Likes: 138
From: NE Ohio
Maybe the dyno brand is what gives a result other than what one might expect from a Dynojet, I see Stickly Wicked Cycles uses a Dynostar brand dyno. But then if Dynostar is measuring things the same way as a Dynojet brand I wouldn't expect a huge difference unless there is some refinement in their software needed. It would be interesting to see the OP post the sheet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
