Dyna Models
#1
#2
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Along the shoreline in SE CT, and SW FL
Posts: 11,173
Received 4,136 Likes
on
1,505 Posts
Different styles on the FX chassis.
Wide Glide has that classic semi chopper look, forwards, that bigger front fork, different rear fender (at least used to have the flared bob rear fender), I think bigger engine by default.
Street Bob...a more sons of anarchy style, some more black paint.
Low...classic clean Dyna/SuperGlide look.
Really gotta go to the dealership and look at them side by side, sit on them side by side...and test ride...see which one YOU like the most.
Wide Glide has that classic semi chopper look, forwards, that bigger front fork, different rear fender (at least used to have the flared bob rear fender), I think bigger engine by default.
Street Bob...a more sons of anarchy style, some more black paint.
Low...classic clean Dyna/SuperGlide look.
Really gotta go to the dealership and look at them side by side, sit on them side by side...and test ride...see which one YOU like the most.
#3
They have the same power train and frame, a fair bit of differences from there. Looks are usually important to most but subjective of course. Sit on all three and see how they fit you, each is different with handle bars and foot locations. The wide glide will stand out for its particular handling, it has the longest rake, some love it of course, but many would say it's the worst choice for good cornering. Most accessories will fit all 3 models. You can go on the HD website and customize and order a street Bob, not so the other two. I would focus on style and fit, functionally the differences are minor and the grand scheme of things. If you want a windshield at some point, the fat Bob dual headlights will limit choices. If you want saddlebags at some point, the Street Bob's side mounted plate will limit choices, of course there are options to move it. $ can change any of them, but which could you get on and ride without wanting to spend a lot on right away?
#4
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: On the Big Blue marble
Posts: 8,376
Received 4,363 Likes
on
2,203 Posts
quick question
They have the same power train and frame, a fair bit of differences from there. Looks are usually important to most but subjective of course. Sit on all three and see how they fit you, each is different with handle bars and foot locations. The wide glide will stand out for its particular handling, it has the longest rake, some love it of course, but many would say it's the worst choice for good cornering. Most accessories will fit all 3 models. You can go on the HD website and customize and order a street Bob, not so the other two. I would focus on style and fit, functionally the differences are minor and the grand scheme of things. If you want a windshield at some point, the fat Bob dual headlights will limit choices. If you want saddlebags at some point, the Street Bob's side mounted plate will limit choices, of course there are options to move it. $ can change any of them, but which could you get on and ride without wanting to spend a lot on right away?
Do they have the same frame? I thought the rake was deeper on the WG?
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10
Ride them all
Disclaimer: I own a 2013 Super Glide Custom which I bought after owning a Road King Custom for nine years.
I just returned from Americade and rode the Fat Bob with their standard forward controls, Street Bob with forward controls (you can get it with mid controls also), Low Rider and Low Rider S with their standard slightly forward mid controls. They did not have a Switchback or Wideglide available to ride.
The Low Rider S was in a class of its own as it comes with the 110 cu.in. engine and the $600 HD nitrogen emulsion shocks. It felt like I could lift the front wheel off the road at will. Definitely different than anything the factory has offered.
The differences in the others with the stock 103 cu.in. engine were distinct with a personality and fit of their own. I am not a fan of forward controls but of the remaining bikes the Fat Bob grabbed me most. The dual disc brakes on a fat front wheel and tire Attached to the wider forks was more stable at highway speeds and seemed more planted through the curves. The stock seat on the FB was without a doubt the most comfortable. I did feel a vibration through the seat of my pants at 90 mph which the others didn't do so it was probably unique to that bike.
The standard Low Rider was a lot of fun to throw around. The 103 had plenty of ***** and the dual disc brakes were confidence building. Don't know why they put thinner hand grips on the Low Rider but that is easy to fix with lots of choices available. I actually prefer the slightly forward position of the pegs over my standard mid controls.
The Street Bob was very familiar to me as it is basically a Super Glide with less bling. If you are into investing to make a bike yours then this is your bike. It is the lowest cost of entry into the family and the perfect pallet for customization. Plan on investing in a seat because the stock seat is like sitting on patio block.
I have ridden a Switchback in the past and it is unique to the breed with a large removeable windshield, floor boards and hard bags. It's like a light weight Road King touring bike. Take off the windshield and bags and you have a cool looking cruiser. ( I just can't get over the fugly wheels the factory puts on this bike)
Never ridden a Wideglide.
As I said at the top it is good to get opinions but do yourself a favor and ride all of them. Looks alone do not tell the story.
Good luck!
I just returned from Americade and rode the Fat Bob with their standard forward controls, Street Bob with forward controls (you can get it with mid controls also), Low Rider and Low Rider S with their standard slightly forward mid controls. They did not have a Switchback or Wideglide available to ride.
The Low Rider S was in a class of its own as it comes with the 110 cu.in. engine and the $600 HD nitrogen emulsion shocks. It felt like I could lift the front wheel off the road at will. Definitely different than anything the factory has offered.
The differences in the others with the stock 103 cu.in. engine were distinct with a personality and fit of their own. I am not a fan of forward controls but of the remaining bikes the Fat Bob grabbed me most. The dual disc brakes on a fat front wheel and tire Attached to the wider forks was more stable at highway speeds and seemed more planted through the curves. The stock seat on the FB was without a doubt the most comfortable. I did feel a vibration through the seat of my pants at 90 mph which the others didn't do so it was probably unique to that bike.
The standard Low Rider was a lot of fun to throw around. The 103 had plenty of ***** and the dual disc brakes were confidence building. Don't know why they put thinner hand grips on the Low Rider but that is easy to fix with lots of choices available. I actually prefer the slightly forward position of the pegs over my standard mid controls.
The Street Bob was very familiar to me as it is basically a Super Glide with less bling. If you are into investing to make a bike yours then this is your bike. It is the lowest cost of entry into the family and the perfect pallet for customization. Plan on investing in a seat because the stock seat is like sitting on patio block.
I have ridden a Switchback in the past and it is unique to the breed with a large removeable windshield, floor boards and hard bags. It's like a light weight Road King touring bike. Take off the windshield and bags and you have a cool looking cruiser. ( I just can't get over the fugly wheels the factory puts on this bike)
Never ridden a Wideglide.
As I said at the top it is good to get opinions but do yourself a favor and ride all of them. Looks alone do not tell the story.
Good luck!
Last edited by Antonio Balls; 06-09-2016 at 03:45 PM.