When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
For all the high-level analysis and risk assessment and risk management, we never really know how a machine or system will behave long-term until it is in sustained actual use over time. IMO That's a point of concern on relatively new clean-sheet (or other) designs ie: Polaris.
Last edited by Northern Glide; Apr 6, 2017 at 03:13 PM.
Planned obsolescence is done by practically every industry, across entire product lines, with many companies.
The light bulb industry is credited with being the first to employ this tactic.
Part of paying for a premium brand is to pay for somewhat longer intervals between replacement. That said, obsolescence is factored into producing a product.
Some products are manufactured to last a certain amount of time. Others are made to intentionally become obsolete when technology eclipses it.
Unfortunately it's a fact of business.
I believe I acknowledged that fact. If products did not eventually need replacement, all companies would essentially put themselves out of business - "one and done". In fact, I remember a friend of a friend once telling me that if tire manufacturers merely made car tires like commercial airplane tires were made, they'd naturally be more expensive, but they would outlive the life any car or truck they were used on. The BMW motorcycle meeting was different - it was almost inherent "bugs" designed to shorten longevity. I regret bringing it up because, without the benefit of the nuances mentioned by the author, it really does just sound like the status quo.
I believe I acknowledged that fact. If products did not eventually need replacement, all companies would essentially put themselves out of business - "one and done".
Many years ago, my stepfather designed a control box for- of all things- the knitting machines that make socks! It was a simple setup, easy install item that did automatically a few functions that normally would take a machine offline for a few hours.
Anyway, we made most of the parts ourselves and assembled the boxes by hand, and we even wen to install them ourselves. And they worked great. And they kept selling, until almost all the machines they would work on were equipped with them. That was a LOT of knitting machines.
And they never, ever broke.
And after two years, we essentially put ourselves out of business- we had cornered the market with a bulletproof product and that was all she wrote.
Many years ago, my stepfather designed a control box for- of all things- the knitting machines that make socks! It was a simple setup, easy install item that did automatically a few functions that normally would take a machine offline for a few hours.
Anyway, we made most of the parts ourselves and assembled the boxes by hand, and we even wen to install them ourselves. And they worked great. And they kept selling, until almost all the machines they would work on were equipped with them. That was a LOT of knitting machines.
And they never, ever broke.
And after two years, we essentially put ourselves out of business- we had cornered the market with a bulletproof product and that was all she wrote.
In the first RobCop movie there was a scene in there where the President of the company that made robotic cops chewed out a subordinate because the sold the local government a Robocop that never broke down vs the one the company was originally trying to pitch the government. He mentioned the last of the service and parts contracts.
I worked at United Technologies and their plane engine division used to sell the engines at cost or below cost just so they could get the service and part contracts.
I considered "strongly" the springfield, nice bike & all the features are meant to out do HD - but that is in looks only, for the price of the Indian springfield I could do up a RK real nice, so they have you paying for the goodies up front, HD just sells them after the fact or you can have them put on for you "expensive".
Indian chromed the front forks, passenger floorboard covers & other little things that they did in stock form - I say give them 5yrs & that will tell where they`re at? are they growing or has word of mouth hurt them to a point of selling the brand once again?
I hope they do well as it has created a competitiveness that has been missing along with a friendly rivalry that just makes it more fun!
There is still a direct lineage starting at the Knucklehead, the Panheads, the Shovelheads, then the Evo and all the others that followed. A direct link.
Plus Harley had family involvement during all of those years.
Irrelevant as that isn't the case. The Indian has zero connection to the company since it's 1953 demise.
Uh, really? Gimme a break. .Have those of you bad mouthing Indian's heritage considered the patents and any intellectual property that Polaris purchased: designs and symbols, names and images? That IS the company's history/heritage and value that goes all the way back. . . .even if it didn't (and it DOES), it still represents a great American name. In terms of heritage, it makes no difference that the company went away for decades...what's important to me is that Polaris retained the styling.
I understand some folks being pissed Polaris for having a bad experience. . .I get it...but they and Indian (with it's pedigree intact) will be around for a long time. . .for those of us who own them, they're beautiful, beautiful, reliable, powerful bikes and if you've not ridden one, then you should check them out. You may have a change of heart.
Last edited by wildcat465; Apr 26, 2017 at 02:59 PM.
Uh, really? Gimme a break. .Have those of you bad mouthing Indian's heritage considered the patents and any intellectual property that Polaris purchased: designs and symbols, names and images? That IS the company's history/heritage and value that goes all the way back. . . .even if it didn't (and it DOES), it still represents a great American name. In terms of heritage, it makes no difference that the company way for decades...what's important to me is that Polaris retained the styling.
I understand some folks being pissed Polaris for having a bad experience. . .I get it...but they and Indian (with it's pedigree intact) will be around for a long time. . .for those of us who own them, they're beautiful, beautiful, reliable, powerful bikes and if you've not ridden one, then you should check them out. You may have a change of heart.
I think as long as you ride what you love then you are doing good. I was a "never Harley" guy for 30 years, so I'm not one of those fan boys that only ride one brand. I owned a Kings Mountain Indian before I traded it in for a Victory. I test ridden the Polaris remake and the bike was fine, but I really wasn't that impressed with them that I had to have one. The fit and finish wasn't top notch like the Kings mountain bike was, the paint jobs are just average and it had a lot of cheap feeling plastic. Plus I grew tired of the retro look. To call the new Indians beautiful is a stretch in my mind. It's different, and that is what initially attracted me to it, but then when the newness wore off I actually thought it looked ugly, or odd at best.
I think it's false advertising when Indian says "since 1901" or "the oldest American motorcycle company " or whatever they say. I get why they say it and why their fan boys buy into it ....but whatever floats their boat. Let's face it .... Polaris isn't a motorcycle company. They are a manufacturing company that makes power sport equipment. Period. But I don't buy bike brands because of their heritage or their love of the product they make. I buy a bike because I love the product. That's why I now own two Harley 's and zero Indians.
Last edited by Klong4HD; Apr 25, 2017 at 05:56 PM.
I've looked at the Indians at the dealership and they look fantastic. If I had the money to buy one and could also afford to throw it away if Indian went belly up like Victory then I would snap one up on a minute.
So for now I"ll just keep on truckin' on my 20 year old EVO.
carl
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Verdad Gallardo
6 Weirdest Harley-Davidsons Ever Sold to the Public
Verdad Gallardo
7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window
Verdad Gallardo
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Uh, really? Gimme a break. .Have those of you bad mouthing Indian's heritage considered the patents and any intellectual property that Polaris purchased: designs and symbols, names and images? That IS the company's history/heritage and value that goes all the way back. . . .even if it didn't (and it DOES), it still represents a great American name. In terms of heritage, it makes no difference that the company way for decades...what's important to me is that Polaris retained the styling.
I understand some folks being pissed Polaris for having a bad experience. . .I get it...but they and Indian (with it's pedigree intact) will be around for a long time. . .for those of us who own them, they're beautiful, beautiful, reliable, powerful bikes and if you've not ridden one, then you should check them out. You may have a change of heart.
Polaris did not buy all of the patents and intellectual property such as designs and symbols, names and image. Other businesses still own some rights to Indian and even make Indian motorcycles http://www.kiwiindian.com/
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Slideshow: Killer Custom's latest build relies on styling changes rather than performance upgrades, giving the cruiser an entirely different personality.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.