New VS Old
I would buy the newest bike I could afford, lessons learned by mistakes they made.
In the case of the Harleys...the Evo is far...far from a comparison to a Pinto.
Many of us even prefer a carb'd Evo to an early of mid vintage Twinkie.
OP....get the bike that pulls at your heart....you'll know when you see it.
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/gener...leys-leak.html
My Shovelhed didn't either, she just marked her spots! She actually never leaked, but had a chain oiler, that well, it oiled the chain...
(sorry haven't read the link yet)
I had a '92 Superglide before that that i absolutely loved and truly regretted selling. I love the Evo motors, last year when i was looking, I was seriously, seriously considering an Evo over a current model. Being a guy who has always turned wrenches on his own bikes, it's hard for me to buy something piled high with computers. But, my wife beat me down on buying something newer...
There are a number of horrors stories about the first generation TC motors... But, also thousands and thousands of them still on the road. Whereas the later Evo motors had all the kinks worked out.
It's a tough call.. But, low mileage doesn't always mean lower maintenance either. If it's been sitting unridden for years and years, or even barely ridden... Did they keep up with the maintenance, etc?
It's not like Harleys are "high tech". It's still a primitive engine. If you're going to compare an Evo to an older car of the late 70's or 80's-early 90's...pick a fox body Mustang 5.0 at least.
Look at the OP budget, 4-6k. To make it a narrower choice he wants a glide. Sure we can find base model twinkie softails or dynas all day long for under 6k, but finding a twinkie Glide in that price range may well result in a lot of high milers. The early twinkes are not see as an improvement over a second generation Evo. The 2nd gen Evos has the newer style electronics and much the same stuff that carried into the first round Twinkies. you're not talking a big gap in technology here.
The "wearable" parts are what counts. You can replace those parts on old bikes with newer tech stuff...tires, oils, brake pads, gaskets, etc. By now, much of that has already been replaced on the used bike market.
Now if you go back to early 70's "AMF Harley" analogies...sure, you can bring back your "pinto" analogy. But most of the Shovels from that era have already had the kinks ironed out of 'em by now, parts replaced with more current better parts. Heck my Shovel was a daily rider til I sold her 2 years ago as I wanted a Springer Softail.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Now you're talking about the difference in a tried and true motor that's been tested for 14 years vs a new engine. Nothing against the 88' twin cam. Good motor. Just doesn't make the Evo a pinto.
Last edited by ieatchickens; Jul 11, 2017 at 07:23 PM.












