Air cleaners
Here's a report LINK that shows the differences in power made when using different shape Performance Air Cleaners.
DKCustomProducts.com
Here's a report LINK that shows the differences in power made when using different shape Performance Air Cleaners.
Second, you are comparing a stock AC with an HD tune, to an open AC with a PV tune. So you are changing more than one variable and still not getting much of a difference. He already has an open AC, so any difference would be even less and probably close to zero.
I stand by my original statement. I might add to it by saying no *perceptible* difference. Open is open.
Last edited by Keithhu; Sep 9, 2018 at 03:11 PM.
Second, you are comparing a stock AC with an HD tune, to an open AC with a PV tune. So you are changing more than one variable and still not getting much of a difference. He already has an open AC, so any difference would be even less and probably close to zero.
I stand by my original statement. I might add to it by saying no *perceptible* difference. Open is open.
Running hundreds of controlled dyno pulls we regularly see differences between air cleaners. We also do pulls with NO air cleaner, can't get more open than that. Without fail, running no air cleaner (as open as you can get) will always produce LESS power than with a good, or even mediocre, performance air cleaner. This is because HOW the air flows after it gets past the filter can make (or not make, depending on the A/C) a measurable, perceptible difference in power.
Just one example is in the 2nd and 3rd dyno charts at this LINK- the 636v (cone shape that the OP was asking about) creates over 5% more power than the 606 A/C. Both are free flowing performance air cleaners with an EBS, the only difference is how the air flows After it goes thru the filter element.
The last two charts in the same link demonstrate the same thing. It is irrelevant if it is a M8, 88, 86, 103, etc.








