Cops - Helmet Exempt - Naked Female Cyclists
Ahh the life of a hippie...
Naked Riders:
On a totally different note, I was riding my bike downtown Saturday afternoon when I was at a stoplight on Congress Avenue. As I was waiting on the light, I noticed 6 bicyclists coming in my direction over the Congress Avenue bridge. As they approached closer, I noticed that they were all girls and that they were all topless. No joke. Topless! As they approached even closer, I then noticed that they were buck naked. I mean, zippo. No clothes. Nada. All they had on were sneakers and bicycle helmets. They were headed north on Congress Avenue toward the Capital bldg. I did a double and triple take as I couldn't believe they were all riding their bikes completely naked. Definitely don't see that every day.
They actually have the right to pull you over to see if you meet two of the three requirements for not wearing a helmet.Age, insurance or MSF course. Years ago APD and DPS used that on me quite a few times. They mainly do it to see if you have been drinking or have any warrents. Most of the warrents police get are through traffic stops, kinda an odds thing. I put the sticker on my last bike and still got pulled over and when I pointed the sticker out to the cop she said "Oh, I have never seen one before," She started our conversation with "the reason I pulled you over is you are not wearing a helmet or have a helmet exp. sticker"
I got pulled over heading to Beverly's of all places ( a biker bar) awhile back and decided to go get a new one for my new bike and have yet to be pulled over again. I can't give to much crap to the cop if he pulls me over though because of the height of my hanldlebars he can switch is reason for pulling me over to that.
FYI- It is totally legal for women to be topless in Austin but not bottomless though. They were probally protesting something, I'm guessing the law stating that states all bicycles must have seats. [8D]
Jeff
The cops have a right to 'play the odds'. You are exactly right, and the odds always favor the House. Any newbie cop can stop any car, bike, or truck and find something. One way or another, the driver will be sending in a check to The House.
That helmet sticker is nothing more than just another tax on the people. And, by the way, what was the size of the waistline of that cop? It was never mentioned,yet statistically, that cop had a waistline that is going to be taking some of my taxes. Why do I have to pay for my fellow citizens gorging themselves at McDonalds? Or, for that matter, why do I have to pay for my fellow citizens' risky sex lives? Most importantly, does anyone really believe that having medical insurance will take any corresponding burden off of the taxpayer when injury occurs? Fuggetaboutit buddy. For one thing, if you have ever had anything more than simple medical care, you know well that the insurers, whether they be health or fire and casualty, DON'T PAY. Oh, sure, they toss you some peanuts to keep Congress and the People placated. But when it comes to fully insuring your event, you will find yourself broke by the time you finish. Now, let me tell you why states have this medical insurance crap for helmetless riders: The health insurers, like most insurers, gather up money by the multiple BILLIONS. And what do they do with that money? They buy state and federal treasury bills. So, anyone that thinks they can have any accident with a head injury and not be a burden to their fellow taxpayers by having medical insurance, is simply uninformed.
The American people are a generous people. We do not mind helping our fellow citizens. If you really care about the public's financial burden, cut off the benefits to the gatecrashers at our southern border. Send the Iraqis and dozens of other foreign governments an invoice for our services rendered, and, generally, stop the government from borrowing money and then wasting it. Plain and simple.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders


