Helmet Crash data damage %
I am happy to avoid the avoidable.
A helmet turns a matter of WHEN in a matter of IF.
That's good enough for me.
BTW, in Italy there is no helmet/no helmet issue. Helmet is mandatory. You don't wear it, the gov takes your bike. It's that simple. So, political struggle over the topic is non existent. This means statistics are gathered for statistical (not political) purpose, and are therefore quite reliable.
About 30% of fatalities in bike accidents are due to head injury, and would have survived with no consequence had they worn a helmet.
I personally know 2 people who would be "normal" (vs. head trauma victims) had they worn a safety cycling helmet.
Both fell from a stationary bicicle (so, you can never tell).
I also find pretty amazing how otherwise sensible people can be fooled into believing the "Helmets protect you just till 14 mph" thing.
I don't say that I don't believe it (which would be trying to pass an opinion as a fact), I quote research that demonstrates scientifically that it isn't true.
You may find interesting reading the MAIDS.
http://www.maids-study.eu/
or at least the conclusions.
Helmets are studied to protect the head from the impact of a FALL, and that's the same at any speed.
If you crash into something, that's another thing entirely.
Safety has two components: prevention and damage control.
A helmet is damage control. I'd rather not need it, and I'm totally, absolutely with you in saying that safety is not reducing your wounds when you crash, safety is NOT to crash.
But, I have enough personal experience to know it's not all in my hands. You can do everything right, and end up kissing the tarmac anyway, just because somebody else was so dork that nobody could prevent him from doing harm to somebody and, by blind bad luck, that somebody is you.
So, just in case, I also try to minimize possible damage. Within reasonable limits.
It doesn't add much, but my grandpa used to say (roughly translated from milanese dialect) that a dime is better than a kick in the ****.

What "reasonable" means, that should be up to one's choice.
Some won't be happy without full leather gear and protections, other are happy with a pair of goggles.
Freakin' psychos!
But it's not just a matter of racing. You are moving forward, facing forward. It's unavoidable that most of the impacts involve the forward area of the head. Add to this that, should you fall sideways, your instinct makes you turn your head to look where you are falling, and you get a pretty high chance of hitting the gorund in the stated area of the helmet.
Statistical findings corroborate theory: about one third of head impacts are in the face/jaw area.
Anyway on very hot climate, I go for half helmet myself. Can't stand the heat in a full face.
Last edited by 99octane; Oct 15, 2009 at 01:00 PM.
I don't want to see any of those people happy with goggles, unless they at least have shorts also.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Now before anyone jumps on me about being the "safety taking away your right to choose police", I'm not. I'm just sharing what I know. There are a million stories in the naked city and yours may be different.
By the way, I own a full face, a 3/4 and a half-helmet. I wear the half helmet most of the time.
How many riders do you know of who were disabled or died because of a helmet.
(Free hint... in all the years of NASCAR, all the crashes, there has been ONE driver who was disabled or died because of his helmet)
Take all the time you need.
Last edited by MidnitEvil; Oct 16, 2009 at 09:29 AM.



