11 streetglide a rougher ride to me
I get what you're saying. I agree with the others here - if you trash the crap out back and upgrade to something better, you may get away with 1 inch less travel. That's part of the allure of the SG isn't it? Lower suspension?...
The 2009 and newer touring frames are superior to the previous year model touring frames. They are more rigid, have a wider, stiffer swingarm, have increased load capacity, and are able to maneuver more confidently without that rear end wobble.
If you look at a 2009 and later bagger frame, it looks amazingly like the old FXR frame from the 80's and 90's. The FXR frame was designed by Erik Buell, and is widely regarded as the best handling Harley ever built. It has the same rigid backbone, and the triangular area under the seat.
Too bad the MoCo can't pony up some decent suspension components that would increase maneuverability and comfort 10 fold. Instead, our new baggers have the same old 1948 Hydro-glide technology in the front forks, and ridiculously cheap, lousy performing rear air shocks.
I don't think that having quality adjustable shocks (compression/rebound/preload) is really asking for too much in a $20K touring motorcycle. But that's just me.
Last edited by Rickr01; May 25, 2011 at 06:41 AM.
"iowna2005roadkingtothatimsellingmynew11streetglid eridesalotrougherthanmyroadkingthoughttheridewould becomparableseemstofeeleverlittlebumpintheroadandi havemyairshockadjustedrigheverowenedanewbikewillit smoothenoutorisithowtheyridethoughttheyhadthesamef rameastheelectrasordotheyrideroughtoo"











