When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Was thinking last nite about how Harley has different approach to minimizing engine vibration between its three main platforms. The Dyna and Touring are all rubber-mounted to the frame designs. They use the "A" engines. For the Softail models, the engine is mounted directly to the frame and the engine is counter-balanced to reduce vibration, giving us the "B" motor.
My question is why doesnt Harley counter-balance ALL the engines? Wouldnt a counter-balanced engine be even more smoother in a rubber-mounted frame?
I am not an engineer, I am just bored.
Counterbalancing uses up torque, makes the engine lazier to take up revs, worsen mileage.
While surely power is not the first thing one may ha e on his mind when buying a Harley, torque and readyness to respond to throttle input in every circumstance and engine rpm usually is.
My guess is Harley webt for counterbalance on softail and touring as these traditionally are the long-range ***-haulers (not that I feel the need to change my Dyna for a Touring).
But then, as I said, it's only a guess.
Everyone's got their thing whether it's solid or rubber mounted engines. and I like 'em both. But I can't help but wonder how well a counterbalanced motor in a non-rubber mounted Glide chassis would handle.
I mean, a counter balanced motor would eliminate the need for the rubber mounted swing arm which would be a perfect cure for speed wobble. Think of it..a Glide that could actually handle higher cornering speeds without resorting to add-on frame stiffeners, etc.
As I mentioned before, my Hayabusa has not one, but two counterbalancers. It gets along pretty good. It's not like there's a giant piece of metal slogging around inside the engine.
I have never owned a Dyna. They look cool in a mini-size big Harley way, but foot pegs are not for me. I prefer boards with forward controls a second choice.
No matter what, the B setup is much better looking than the A. That's just a fact...
Money plain and simple. Non counterbalanced motors are cheaper to produce so why install them in a platform where they are not needed. And Softails did exist without the counterbalanced motor for many years, so my question is why the counterbalancer at all?
Counterbalancing uses up torque, makes the engine lazier to take up revs, worsen mileage.
While surely power is not the first thing one may ha e on his mind when buying a Harley, torque and readyness to respond to throttle input in every circumstance and engine rpm usually is.
My guess is Harley webt for counterbalance on softail and touring as these traditionally are the long-range ***-haulers (not that I feel the need to change my Dyna for a Touring).
But then, as I said, it's only a guess.
The touring don't use the B. Only the softail does. The touring has a rubber mounted engine just like the dyna. It has more to do with the fact that doctors, dentists and lawyers want a smoother ride so they put it in the softail.
The touring don't use the B. Only the softail does. The touring has a rubber mounted engine just like the dyna. It has more to do with the fact that doctors, dentists and lawyers want a smoother ride so they put it in the softail.
Precisely. So why not put the counter-balanced engine in the Touring and Dyna frames along with the rubber-mounting isolation design, thereby resulting in an even more smoother running machine? Ok, I accept the cost arguement as one reason why MoCo dont do it, but in theory, wouldnt this result in a smoother riding bike?
Ouch! I bet doctors and etc ride touring rigs five to one over softails. Face it, softails are the direct link to the original Harleys. Shock rigs like the tourers and dynas are from that abberation -- the Duo-Glide started in the '50s -- with those ugly shock frames.
Ever see a touring bike with those plastic bags removed? Skinny swing arm off a Honda 500 and rubberized shocks that look like a Hippo's sex toy. Sorry, softails are the real Harleys, the rest are just poorly engineered copies of a '50s Triumph frame...
Last edited by bjewell; Feb 23, 2012 at 09:59 AM.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window
Verdad Gallardo
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Yes if that is what the Harley buyer wanted. But the counterbalance also takes up more room. It works on the softail because of the oil tank being remotely mounted. The softail frame had the room for it. It wouldn't fit on the other frames. I like my engine vibration and wouldn't want the B engine. That is why Harley listens to the buyers and doesn't do it.
The touring don't use the B. Only the softail does. The touring has a rubber mounted engine just like the dyna. It has more to do with the fact that doctors, dentists and lawyers want a smoother ride so they put it in the softail.
I always love that one. OH...and I'm not a doctor, dentist or lawyer.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.